A Review of Dependant Support Claims - Hull on Estates #130

Listen to A Review of Dependant Support Claims

This week on Hull on Estates, David Smith and Jonathan Morse review some of the recent podcasts and hone in on some of the evidentiary requirements of a common-law spousal relationship as it relates to dependant support claims under the Succession Law Reform Act. They look at some recent case law and some of the requirements under the Ontario statute.

Comments? Send us an email at hull.lawyers@gmail.com, call us on the comment line at 206-350-6636, or leave us a comment on the Hull on Estates blog.
 

Continue Reading...

Identifying a Common Law Spouse

Common law spouses are not included in Part II of Ontario’s Succession Law Reform Act, which governs intestate succession (dying without a valid Will).

In British Columbia, unlike Ontario, intestate laws now provide the same rights to common law spouses as to married spouses, if the couple lived together in a marriage-like relationship for a period of at least two years before the death of one of them.  Recent case law out of British Columbia has grappled with the issue of identifying common law spouses in cases of intestacy. 

In Austin v. Goerz, 2007 BCCA 586, the deceased had been separated, but not divorced, from his wife for six years.  During the last six years of his life, the deceased lived with another woman, Ms. Goerz, as husband and wife.  The deceased died without a Will.  On the death of the deceased, the legally married spouse, Mrs. Austin, brought a claim seeking a declaration that Ms. Goerz was not the deceased’s common law spouse.  The lower court dismissed Mrs. Austin’s claim, and she appealed to the British Columbia Court of Appeal.  On appeal, Mrs. Austin argued that the deceased, while legally married, could not have a common law spouse as he lacked the legal capacity to marry.  Mrs. Austin also argued that Ms. Goerz was not a common law spouse as there was no financial dependence between her and the deceased during their relationship.  Both arguments were dismissed.  The Court of Appeal recognized that common law relationships can exist even though one or both partners lack the capacity to marry.  Furthermore, lack of financial dependence is not determinative in identifying common law relationships. 

Have a great day!

Bianca La Neve 

Will Challenge Litigation - Part 7 - Hull on Estate and Succession Planning

 

Listen to Will Challenge Litigation - Part 7

This week on Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Ian and Suzana continue their discussion on the Will Challenge Process, step by step.

They discuss fraud as one of the most serious ways in which a will can be challenged. Evidential requirements are important when allegations of fraud or forgery are made. Handwriting analysis and other scientific means of determining the legitimacy of evidence can be employed to determine whether or not fraud has occurred. Ian and Suzana also talk about lack of proper execution being grounds to challenge a will.

If you have any comments, send us an email at hullandhull@gmail.com or call us on the comment line at 206-457-1985 or leave a comment on our blog.

Continue Reading...

Millionaire Widow Seeks Support

 A recent Ontario decision, MacDougall v. MacDougall Estate [2008] O.J. No. 2930 (S.J.C.), dealt with the issue of adequate provision for proper support under Part V of the Succession Law Reform Act (“SLRA”). 

The deceased died in 2004.  His widow (his wife from a second marriage) commenced an application for support from the deceased’s estate.   She claimed that the deceased had failed to make adequate provision for her.  The deceased had left her over $1 million in assets, which represented a significant portion of his assets.  The balance of the deceased’s estate was left to his children from his first marriage, and his grandchildren and great grandchildren.  The court found that the deceased had given careful consideration to the disposition of his estate and the needs of his widow. 

Although the widow qualified as a dependant at the time of the deceased’s death for the purposes of the SLRA, the court ultimately held that she was not entitled to support.  The widow had not met the burden of satisfying the court that the deceased had failed to make adequate provision for her.  Her current assets invested conservatively would generate $45,000.00 per annum net of tax.  The court found that the widow’s claim for support was driven not by need, but by her wish to live the lifestyle she had enjoyed with the deceased prior to 1998 when the deceased became ill. 

Have a great day!

Bianca La Neve

Challenging A Will Before Death

It has commonly been assumed that a will challenge cannot proceed prior to the death of the testator. The will speaks only upon the death of the testator, and a testator enjoys testamentary freedom to revise or otherwise revoke the will at any time prior to death, or to deal freely with his or her assets.

However, as reported in the New Jersey Law Blog, a recent California case has determined that when a conservator secures court approval of an estate plan while an individual is still alive, any challenge to the will must be made at that time, and not after the death of the individual.

In Murphy v. Murphy, the Court of Appeal for the State of California, First Appellate District, Docket No. A115177, the testator had suffered a stroke. A conservator was appointed for the testator, who sought court approval of the testator’s estate plan. A son, who was left out of the estate plan, was put on notice and did not challenge the estate plan.

After death, the son sought to challenge the estate plan. The Court of Appeal held that the son’s claim was barred on the basis of “collateral estoppel”. The son was not allowed to relitigate matters that were litigated in a prior proceeding.

The blog’s author observes that the decision “essentially bulletproofs the will of a person found incompetent and placed under the protection of a conservator, if the Court approves a revised estate plan with appropriate notice being given to all parties in interest who may have any basis to object.”

In Ontario, there is no similar procedure for approval of an estate plan. In fact, an attorney for property or guardian for property is expressly barred from making a will on behalf of the incapable person.  

However, at least two Ontario decisions (Stern v. Stern and Weinstein v. Weinstein (Litigation Guardian of) have commented to the effect that the court should not “close its eyes to the fact that litigation among expectant heirs is no longer deferred as a matter of course until the death of an incapable person”.

Paul Trudelle

Payment of Legal Fees

Collection of legal fees can be an ongoing issue for lawyers. It is certainly an issue for a Chicago lawyer, who faces a 15 month suspension arising out of matters relating to the payment of his fees.

According to a report in the Chicago Tribune, the lawyer provided legal services to a client and members of her family on various matters. The lawyer and the client agreed that the client, an exotic dancer at the time, would perform nude dances for him in his office as a way to cut down on legal fees. The lawyer also received free nude dances at the club where she worked. 

The lawyer credited the client with $534 as against his accounts. 

The client later complained of sexual assault. A grand jury declined to indict the lawyer, but the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, a branch of the state Supreme Court, conducted an investigation leading to the suspension.

Thanks for reading.

Paul Trudelle

Fiduciary Accounting - Hull on Estates #129

 

Listen to Fiduciary Accounting

This week on Hull on Estates, Ian Hull and Suzana Popovic-Montag discuss fiduciary accounting. Who is a fiduciary and what is a fiduciary's duty to account? They cite several cases that illustrate  fiduciary accounting rules:

  • Re Taerk, [1975] O.R. 482 (C.A.).
  • Re Silver Estate, (1999) 31 E.T.R. (2nd) 256.
  • Roger Estate v. Leung, [2001] O.J. No. 2171.
  • Fair v. Campbell Estate, 2002 3 E.T.R. 3rd 67, Langdon J.
  • Fareed v. Wood, 2005 WL 1460361 (Ont. S.C.J.).
  • McAllister Estate v. Hudgin, 2008 CanLII 42213 (ON S.C.)

Comments? Send us an email at hull.lawyers@gmail.com, call us on the comment line at 206-350-6636, or leave us a comment on the Hull on Estates blog.

 

Continue Reading...

Will Challenge Litigation - Part 6 - Hull on Estate and Succession Planning

 

Or, listen to Will Challenge Litigation - Part 6 by clicking here.

This week on Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Ian and Suzana continue their discussion on the Will Challenge Process, step by step.

They pick up where they left off last week by addressing undue influence. What is undue influence and how do we prove it? Next week they will continue their discussion on the different grounds upon which a will can be challenged.

If you have any comments, send us an email at hullandhull@gmail.com or call us on the comment line at 206-457-1985 or leave a comment on our blog.

Continue Reading...

COMING SOON TO AN ORDER GIVING DIRECTIONS NEAR YOU

While I was in Court in Toronto on Friday, Mr. Justice Brown advised the court room in general that with respect to most Orders Giving Directions granted by him (and possibly other judges on the Estates List), the Order Giving Directions will include a Schedule that provides that the Applicant is to file with the Estates Office a tabbed, three ring, red 1” binder labelled “Endorsements/Orders Brief”, which is to be maintained as part of the record of the proceeding. Within five days after the making of any endorsement or Order in the proceeding, the Applicant is to file a copy of such endorsement or Order in the next available tab in the Brief.

Mr. Justice Brown observed that the purpose of such a Brief is to allow the presiding Judge on any subsequent hearing date to quickly determine the history of the proceeding, and all judicial determinations made to date.

The Schedule also provides that Factums are to be filed on all subsequent motions.

The utility of such a Brief and the requirement to file a Factum appears obvious. The requirements to create the Brief and to file a Factum will clearly assist the Court in determining the history of the proceeding, and allowing for the prompt and efficient determination of the matter before it.

Thank you for reading.

Paul Trudelle

Prosper and Live Long

Comparisons of life expectancy across different regions of Canada suggest that Southern, Urban dwellers in mid-size cities tend to live the longest. Northern groups, particularly those with large aboriginal segments, tend to face a much grimmer situation, according to this 2000 article,living approximately 4 years less on average.

Some encouraging news is that the country’s average life expectancy continues to rise. Of particular interest to me: men are approaching women in terms of life expectancy, although we’re not quite there yet. As against the rest of the world, Canada just barely cracks the top ten according to Wikipedia with an average life expectancy of 80.34, trailing number 1 Andorra’s (Andorra - who knew?) average lifespan of 83.52 years.  Swazilanders, with an average lifespan of 39.6 years, have the terrible distinction of being at the bottom of the list.

Women apparently live longer than men in every region except South Asia.

As would be expected, there seems to be an obvious and very strong correlation between level of industrialization and overall wealth and longer lifespan.

Are you feeling optimistic? Try this Life Expectancy Test to get a sense of the factors affecting you.

Thanks for reading.

Sean Graham

Sharia and the Common Law

The UK, home of the Common Law, seems willing to experiment with alternatives under certain conditions. Elements of Sharia law are apparently making inroads into some areas, most notably family law and estate law.

In early 2008, the Archbishop of the Church of England suggested that the incorporation of elements of Islamic law into the English polity was unavoidable, causing quite a stir before being echoed by a top judge. For a sense of the extent of the debate this has caused in the UK, see this website.

The possible application of Sharia law and other forms of law in the same country has been in the news with respect to any number of countries, including the US, Nigeria, and Australia.

Here’s an interesting article from Australia suggesting that concerns about Sharia law in that country could be overblown. Also, see here for a reversal of the pattern of Common Law countries debating whether to incorporate Sharia, showing that change is not necessarily a one-way street.

Canada is not left out of the debate, with the possible incorporation of Sharia law into some legal relations having been recently ruled out by Quebec and Ontario, the two largest provinces.

It ought to be fascinating to see how things develop in the coming years.

Thanks for reading.

Sean Graham

 

Death: Wrongful but not actionable (in Ontario)

Wrongful death does not give rise to a claim under Ontario law. Section 38(1) of Ontario’s Trustee Act states in part that “if death results from such injuries no damages shall be allowed for the death or for the loss of the expectation of life”.

Contrast this with the US, where wrongful death is very much a cause of action (perhaps depending on the state). In fact, in many prominent criminal cases, the end of the first trial is often just a pause in litigation, after which the civil wrongful death proceedings begin: some recent examples include the Natalee Holloway case, the O.J. Simpson case and the Scott Peterson case. Given the “balance of probabilities” civil standard of proof that a litigant must surpass versus the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard that the government must satisfy in a criminal trial, it is not unheard of for the defendant to avoid conviction and jail time but not a financially crippling loss in civil Court.

If an institution with deep pockets or wealthy individual defendant can be successfully linked to an alleged wrongful death, then the chances of securing a large award increase, particularly if an award for the payment of punitive damages award can be obtained.  Cases brought against jails after inmates’ deaths offer numerous examples: see here, here and here.

While the deceased’s estate cannot sue in Ontario, family members do have limited rights to redress. Under Ontario’s Family Law Act defined family members can still sue for their “pecuniary loss resulting from the injury or death”. It is noteworthy that even here damages appear to be limited to pecuniary losses, and do not allow for claims regarding punitive or aggravated damages.

Thanks for reading.

Sean Graham

Stop the news, I want to get off!

Boy, does August ever seem sleepy and restful in retrospect. After a summer in which the Beijing Olympics was probably the major story, the first two weeks of September have served to snap Canadians and Americans out of their reverie. Consider the following developments, all crammed into just over three weeks:

- The US Democratic Convention, featuring the first African-American candidate on any US presidential ticket (and by my hasty reckoning the first black candidate with a strong chance to win executive office anywhere in the entire Western World), takes place from August 25 to August 28;

- The US Republican Convention, featuring the first female candidate on a Republican ticket, and only the second in history, takes place from September 1 to 4;

- Canadian Federal Election commences;

- Hurricane Ike hits Texas; and

- Financial turmoil hits the markets.

And that’s just North America. All this as kids go back to school and summer vacations become a thing of the past. What’s a politico-newsophile like yours truly to do? There’s just not enough hours in the day to keep up with everything.

At least by the end of the first week in November, both elections will be history, hurricane season should be over and hopefully some calm will have returned in the markets. Just in time for the holiday rush. Oh well, there’s always next summer.

Thanks for reading.

Sean Graham

Will Challenge Litigation - Part 5 - Hull on Estate and Succession Planning

Or, listen to the audio version of Will Challenge Litigation - Part 5

This week on Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Ian and Suzana continue their discussion on the Will Challenge Process, step by step.

They continue to discuss the process of will challenges in closer detail. What makes a good case? They talk about the five different grounds upon which a will can be challenged:

  1. Lack of testamentary capacity
  2. Existence of suspicious circumstances
  3. Will not having been properly executed
  4. Existence of undue influence
  5. Possibility of fraud

If you have any comments, send us an email at hullandhull@gmail.com or call us on the comment line at 206-457-1985 or leave a comment on our blog.

Sleepless Nights

Here’s a story from Calgary that will make every lawyer tremble documenting the conviction of a mother of three, and assistant at a law firm, for misappropriating $1.4 million from the firm’s trust account.

A great reminder of the need to restrict access to a trust account and exercise vigilance in who can access it. Of course, in the hustle and bustle of practice it is possible for these types of basics to fall to the background as we try to satisfy clients with the outcomes of their cases.

Most lawyers I know operate on the assumption that everything which leaves their office, including trust cheques, is their responsibility. Since not everything in every case can always be reviewed, that implies a certain amount of trust towards assistants, clerks, and other support staff. It also implies that it is very wise to know the people that work for you, and consciously keep up with them from time to time.

Nothing will protect from every rogue of course, but you never know what you might find out by staying on top of things…

Thanks for reading.

Sean Graham

The All-Powerful Constructive Trust

In Langston v. Landen, a recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal, one of three co-executors of an estate having a value of some $24 million (in the words of the Court) "managed to shunt the other two executors to the sidelines.  He started to loot the estate."  Among Landen's transgressions was his use of estate assets to purchase a home in Forest Hill which he had put in his wife's name.  On a motion for summary judgment, Justice Greer had imposed a constructive trust on the house for the benefit of the estate.

Landen's wife appealed.  However, the Court easily concluded that the fact that legal title was in her name was irrelevant in circumstances in which the entire purchase proceeds came from the estate.  Adopting a quote from the Reasons for Decision of Justice Greer, the Court stated: "Since the money came from Landen in his capacity as a fiduciary, the constructive trust or express trust flows from him and the money can be traced from him to the house purchase and renovation." 

So too, for the same reasons, the wife's entitlement to any share of the property as the "matrimonial home" was negated.  Of passing interest to the profession was the Court's additional conclusion that Justice Greer was well within her jurisdiction by imposing a vesting order on the house for the benefit of the estate in the absence of a motion seeking such relief. 

David M. Smith

 

 

Georgia on My Mind

In 1949, Georgia O'Keeffe donated the Alfred Stieglitz Collection of Modern American and European Art to Fisk University ("Fisk") in Nashville, Tennessee.  O'Keeffe, as executor of her late husband's estate, divided his collection of paintings, sculptures, prints and photographs and donated the nearly 1,000 pieces to six institutions, including Fisk.  O'Keeffe had donated the collection to Fisk with the express stipulation that the paintings not be sold or exchanged, as evidenced by a letter written that year to then Fisk-President Charles S. Johnson.  

In 2005, cash-strapped Fisk attempted to sell the paintings from the collection in order to rectify its 'troubled financial condition'.  In court filings, Fisk officials indicated that the school would run out of operating funds by the end of 2007 without selling 50 percent of the collection.

In March 2008, the Court enjoined Fisk from selling the painting and ordered the school to put the collection on display by October 6th or forfeit the collection to the Georgia O'Keeffe Museum in Santa Fe, New Mexico. 

Since then, Fisk, arguing that selling the art for a reported $30 million does not violate O'Keeffe's original intent, has filed an appeal to sell half the collection to a museum in Arkansas.  This week, Fisk asked the appeals court to send the case back to trial court saying the judge should not have blocked the sale without a more comprehensive hearing.  Those of you familiar with my recent Machu Picchu blog, and the Beaverbrook blog trilogy of March 2007, October 2007 and August 2008 will find  some parallels here:  In court documents, the parties disagree as to whether the collection is a charitable gift as opposed to an asset that Fisk can dispose of at will.

Interestingly, the Fisk website indicates that "The Alfred Stieglitz Collection is unavailable for viewing due to renovations currently underway at the Carl Van Vechten Gallery". 

David M. Smith

Will Challenge Litigation - Part 4 - Hull on Estate and Succession Planning Video Podcast #129

 

This week on Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Ian and Suzana continue their discussion on the Will Challenge Process, step by step.

They continue to discuss the value of the discovery process and intense investigation. The goal is to get to the mediation process as soon as possible. New evidence may lead to the next stage: the pre-trial. Ian and Suzana talk about the pre-trial process and what you can expect during this stage.

If you have any comments, send us an email at hullandhull@gmail.com or call us on the comment line at 206-457-1985 or leave a comment on our blog.

The Limitations of a Notice of Contestation

Sections 44 and 45 of the Estates Act provide a summary procedure for the determination of claims and demands against estates.  Certainly in my experience, this procedure would appear to be relatively seldom used.  However, the possibly draconian effect of a Notice of Contestation is an important consideration for any solicitor whose client is served with such Notice in response to a claim.

In Omiciuolo (Estate Trustee of) v. Pasco, the Court of Appeal considered whether a Notice of Contestation could be employed as a tactic for defeating a support claim made against an estate pursuant to the provisions of Part V of the Succession Law Reform Act.  Under sections 44 and 45 of the Estates Act, where an estate trustee is served with a "claim or demand" against the estate, the claimant may be served with a Notice of Contestation in writing.  A solicitor acting for such a claimant has an onerous duty to ensure that, if his or her client is served with a Notice of Contestation, appropriate steps are taken to advance the claim as required. If not, the claimant is "deemed to have abandoned the claim and it is forever barred." 

In Omiciuolo, after considering various authorities, the Court determined that "the respondent's claims for declaratory relief, which is the nature of her claim under the SLRA as well as her other claims arising from her relationship as a spouse, do not fall within the meaning of a "claim or demand" under ss. 44 and 45 of the Estates Act."

David M. Smith


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variation of Trusts - Hull on Estates Podcast #127

Listen to Variation of Trusts

Craig Vander Zee and Bianca La Neve discuss variation of trusts, with an emphasis on the Variation of Trusts Act and approval of variations of trusts on behalf of minor, unascertained, unborn or contingent beneficiaries.  The well-known case of R. v. Irving (1975), 11. O.R. (2d) 42 (H.C.) is discussed.

Comments? Send us an email at hull.lawyers@gmail.com, call us on the comment line at 206-350-6636, or leave us a comment on the Hull on Estates blog.

Continue Reading...

A "Lightbulb" Moment

"Your worth consists in what you are and not in what you have." --- Thomas Edison

Considered one of the most prolific inventors in history, Thomas Edison held over a thousand U.S. patents in his name (click here for a full list of all 1,093 patents).  Incredibly, when awarded the Congressional Gold Medal in 1928, Edison's work was valued at nearly $16 billion.

So how could the man who invented the phonograph, incandescent light bulb, motion picture camera, the stock ticker and the alkaline battery amongst others, possibly have died a comparatively poor man?  When he died in 1931, his estate was worth about $12 million, but most of this was buildings and equipment in his labs and factories.

In the January 1932 issue of Modern Mechanix, Remsen Crawford, biographer and personal friend, reported that Edison had revealed that his many patents never made a fortune for him, rather his income was primarily derived from his activities as manufacturer.  Edison went on to explain that U.S. government patent protection expires after 17 years, but in the case of such great inventions, someone always steps forward to challenge the real inventor's right to his patent.  Edison spent a lot of money in court trying to establish his claims to his inventions.  In fact, Edison indicated that he spent more defending his patents in court than he had ever derived from them on a royalty basis.

As so eloquently summed up by his good friend Henry Ford:  "He was not a money-maker...his own portion was a mere nothing compared with the wealth he created for the world."

David M. Smith

 

Will Challenge Litigation - Part 4 - Hull on Estate and Succession Planning

Listen to Will Challenge Litigation Part 4

This week on Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Ian and Suzana continue their discussion on the Will Challenge Process, step by step.

They continue to discuss the value of the discovery process and intense investigation. The goal is to get to the mediation process as soon as possible. New evidence may lead to the next stage: the pre-trial. Ian and Suzana talk about the pre-trial process and what you can expect during this stage.

If you have any comments, send us an email at hullandhull@gmail.com or call us on the comment line at 206-457-1985 or leave a comment on our blog.

Continue Reading...

25, 72, 44, 6 and 24 - not your weekend lottery numbers

My wife has a not-so-secret crush on Dr. Sanjay Gupta.  In late May, three and a half months prior to 72 yr old John McCain's shocking selection of his 44 yr old running mate, my wife caught a Dr. Gupta special on CNN called "The First Patient".  The program explored in detail, presidential physical and mental health throughout history and the mechanism for substitute decision-making in this regard.

Interesting topic for a blog I thought to myself.

The 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution "deals with succession to the Presidency, and establishes procedures both for filling a vacancy in the office of the Vice President as well as responding to Presidential disabilities" (Wikipedia).  This Amendment has only been invoked 6 times since its ratification (and two of these occasions actually involved application of a Section of the Amendment that allowed for the appointment of a Vice President during a Vice Presidential vacancy).  Incredibly, the following occasions did not result in the invocation of the Amendement:

  • Abraham Lincoln lying unconscious for several hours after he was shot until he died;
  • James Garfield being incapacitated for eighty days by an assassin's bullet before dying;
  • Woodrow Wilson suffering from a stroke which left him disabled for the last eighteen months of his term; and
  • Dwight D. Eisenhower suffering from a heart attack in 1955 and a stroke in 1957.

Even after the assassination attempt by John Hinkley in 1981, then-President Ronald Reagan did not invoke the Amendment (although there was a heated debate about this amongst his aides).

As an aside, my wife tells me that the 25th Amendment has been invoked 3 times in the television series 24 in seasons 2, 4 and 6 (she's also a bit of a Kiefer fan).

David M. Smith

Not a neurosurgeon. Not Jack Bauer. But secure with myself anyhow.

 

To What Extent Must an Attorney Keep Accounts?

The recent decision in McAllister Estate v. Hudgin provides a helpful review of the nature of a trustee’s duty to account.

In McAllister, the Deceased named her daughter as her estate trustee and divided the residue of her estate between her daughter and her son.  The daughter had acted as the Deceased’s attorney for property in the four years prior to the Deceased’s death. 

After the Deceased’s death, the son sought an order compelling the daughter to pass accounts for her actions as attorney. 

The daughter argued that the son was not entitled to an accounting because (1) he had no standing to request it (although she did not seriously pursue this ground) and (2) she was not required to keep accounts because when she was acting as attorney her mother was capable. 

Pattillo J. found that as the mother had been capable, the attorney had no duty under s. 42 of the Substitute Decisions Act to keep accounts, although the court retained the discretion to order an attorney to pass accounts for all or part of the period in which she acted. 

In making this determination, the court considered two main issues: (1) the extent of the attorney’s involvement in the grantor’s affairs; and (2) whether the applicant seeking to compel an accounting has raised significant concerns about the attorney’s management of the grantor’s affairs. 

Ultimately, the court decided that both criteria had been met.  However, the court stopped short of requiring the daughter to produce formal accounts, deciding that the production of bank statements and investment records was sufficient.   

Have a great day,

Megan F. Connolly

"Jewish Clause" Causes Family Fued

A recent case in the United States explored the effect of a provision in a will that disinherited beneficiaries who married outside their religion. 

In re Estate of Max Feinberg involved a Jewish dentist who, in his will, had established a testamentary trust to divide his assets. 

The trust contained the provision that any descendant of the Deceased’s (other than one of his children) who married outside the Jewish faith and any of his/her descendants were treated as having died as at the date of marriage. The Deceased had five grandchildren, all of whom were, at the time of the litigation, married and only one of whom to a Jew. 

A grandchild, who was married to a non-Jew, sued the trustees of the trust alleging mismanagement of the assets. The trustees responded by saying that as the grandchild had married a non-Jew, she had no further interest in the trust and, as such, had no standing to make the complaint.  The grandchild responded that the clause should be voided.  

The appellate court, in a 2-1 decision, found that the provision was unenforceable mainly for policy reasons. The majority pointed out that allowing a clause like the one in Mr. Feinberg’s will to be valid was a slippery slope and, in extreme situations, could lead to the court enforcing “the worst bigotry imaginable.” The majority also found technical problems with the clause, such as it did not speak to what happened if a beneficiary married a non-Jew, later divorced and remarried someone who was Jewish. 

The judge who dissented was more sympathetic to the clause, suggesting that a person should be able to do what he wants with his money and that the objective of the clause was not contrary to public policy. 

Have a great day!

Megan F. Connolly

Helmley's Dog Trouble Forced to Get by on Less

As I have blogged about before, when Leona Helmsley died, she left a $12 million trust for the benefit of her beloved Maltese, Trouble. 

After her death, Trouble’s guardians designated in Ms. Helmsley’s will declined to act, and the general manager from one of her hotels agreed to step up and fulfil the role.   

The trustees of Ms. Helmsley’s estate decided that a $12 million trust was a little rich, even for a dog as cute as Trouble and, over the summer, convinced a court to reduce the size of the trust to $2 million. 

In support of their request, the trustees submitted an affidavit sworn by Trouble’s legal guardian. In the affidavit, the guardian provided a breakdown of the $190,200 in expenses Trouble incurs each year:

  • The guardian is paid $60,000.00 to watch Trouble;
  • Full-time private security costs $100,000.00 per year;
  • Grooming fees are $8,000.00 per year;
  • Veterinary care costs $2,500 per year (although, apparently poor Trouble’s kidney’s are failing and the guardian anticipates the medical expenses increasing to $18,000.00 per year);
  • Food costs approximately $1,200 per year; and
  • Miscellaneous expenses were estimated at $3,000 per year (for vacations, perhaps?)

The guardian pointed out that, even uninvested, $2 million would be sufficient to pay Trouble’s expenses for the next ten years even though, given her health problems, she isn’t expected to live more than half that.

Still...just think about how many dog toys $12 million could have bought.

Have a great day,

Megan F. Connolly

Tracking Down Heirs - Hull on Estates #126

Listen to Tracking Down Heirs

This week on Hull on Estates, Diane Vieira and Rick Bickhram discuss the issue of when an estate trustee is responsible to search for potential heirs to an estate.

Comments? Send us an email at hull.lawyers@gmail.com, call us on the comment line at 206-350-6636, or leave us a comment on the Hull on Estates blog.

Will Challenge Litigation - Part 3 - Hull on Estate and Succession Planning

Listen to Will Challenge Litigation - Part 3

This week on Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Ian and Suzana continue their discussion on the Will Challenge Process, step by step.

They discuss what happens during the Discovery process and explore what Mediation is and how it works. Will challenge proceedings can benefit greatly from facilitation during the litigation process.

To see the video version of this podcast, you can also download it from iTunes or watch it on YouTube on the Hull and Hull channel: http://www.youtube.com/HullandHullLLP

If you have any comments, send us an email at hullandhull@gmail.com or call us on the comment line at 206-457-1985 or leave a comment on our blog.