Pachaluck Estate v. DiFebo - a Passing of Accounts Doesn't Come Cheap ... to Anyone
The recent decision of Pachaluck Estate v. DiFebo provides a useful example of the costs exposure that parties can face on an application to pass accounts.
In this case, a beneficiary had objected to the compensation the estate trustee had taken. The court agreed to an extent – it ordered compensation be reduced (by about $9,700), but not by as much as requested by the beneficiary.
The court then had to decide the issue of costs. The executor argued that he had been prudent in his administration of the estate and while the beneficiary was successful in a partial reduction in compensation, she was unsuccessful with regard to most of the objections she had raised. The executor sought fully indemnification for his costs from the estate and argued that the beneficiary should receive partial indemnity costs.
The beneficiary argued that because she was successful in obtaining a reduction in compensation and because she was unable to get a full accounting until the court had ordered one be produced, her costs should be fully paid by the executor.
The court found that there was a mixed result in its determination of the application to pass accounts. While the court agreed the executor had acted in good faith, a reduction in compensation was nevertheless ordered and the court was satisfied that a full accounting would not have been provided absent a court order.
The court was critical of the fact that neither party had served an offer to settle and found that to the extent the estate trustee and beneficiary were entitled to receive costs from the estate it should be on a reduced basis. Ultimately, the court awarded each less than half the costs that were sought.
This case is a reminder of some of the perils involved in pursuing a contested passing of accounts. To begin with, both parties were stuck paying more than half the costs each had incurred personally and, as such, were "out of pocket" in the litigation. Second, the compensation that was repaid to the estate as a result of the litigation was less than the legal fees that ended up coming out of the estate to reimburse the parties, which begs the question of whether the beneficiary was worse off for pursuing the litigation in the first place.
Have a great day!
Megan F. Connolly
