Paying the Debts of an Estate

It is a trite principle of estate administration that "debts must be paid before beneficiaries."  Assuming this maxim is followed, the estate trustee will not assume any personal responsibility for the debts of the deceased. On the other hand, if the estate trustee distributes the estate without due consideration to creditors' entitlements, the estate trustee may be left personally exposed unless the beneficiaries return their entitlement to the estate trustee to fund any unpaid debts.

To be fully relieved from personal liability, the estate trustee must make reasonable efforts to locate and satisfy the creditors of the deceased.  Advertising for creditors is therefore an essential step in protecting the estate trustee from liability and ensuring that the creditors of the deceased have had the opportunity to be paid. But the importance of the advertisement ought not to be overstated.  If an estate trustee can be proven to have had independent knowledge of a creditor who does not claim (for whatever reason) in response to the advertisement, and if the estate trustee distributes in the face of this knowledge, he or she could conceivably be personally responsible to such a creditor.

The bottom line is that the estate trustee, understandably focused on his or her fiduciary duty to the beneficiaries, stands in the shoes of the deceased and must give more than a passing regard to the creditors of the estate.

David M. Smith

David M. Smith - Click here for more information on David Smith.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Famous Vermeer Painting Faces Nazi-Era Claim

The heirs of a man who sold a well known Vermeer painting to Hitler are seeking its return from the Austrian museum where it is currently on display.  

The Art of Painting”, which dates between 1665 and 1668, is currently housed at the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna and is considered one of Vermeer’s most important works. Its exact value is unknown, but conservative estimates put it at in excess of $211 million (US). 

Vermeer never sold it, but after his death his widow was forced to do so because of financial hardship. The painting eventually made it to Jagomir Czernin, part of the Austrian aristocracy, in the early 1900s. Czernin later tried to sell it to an American industrialist in the 1930s, but when the annexation of Austria to the Third Reich occurred, foreign sales of that nature were prohibited.

Czernin then tried to sell it to a German industrialist, but Hitler found out about the potential sale and decided he wanted to buy the painting for a museum he had previously established. Hitler, because of his office, held a prerogative to acquire goods before others and ended up purchasing the painting for what was then about $660,000.00 (US) – a price Czernin’s heirs allege was below market value. 

Czernin’s heirs are now arguing that the sale amounted to duress because his family was under threat at the time (as a result of his wife’s Jewish ancestry). Apparently, after the painting was sold Czernin spent fifteen years unsuccessfully suing to get it back. His heirs are now continuing the fight.

So far, the museum has refused to return it. It says there is no evidence of duress at the time the sale was made or that the painting was undervalued. Currently, the Austrian Commission for Provenance Research is considering the matter and is expected to make recommendations this year regarding whether the piece should be returned to the heirs.

As a postscript to yesterday's blog on the litigation involving the Toronto Humane Society, I note the decision I discussed is now available online.  

Have a great weekend!

Megan F. Connolly

Megan F. Connolly - Click here for more information on Megan Connolly.

Court Appoints Financial Monitor to Review Humane Society's Finances

The Superior Court of Justice (at Toronto) ruled Tuesday that the accounting firm Deloitte & Touche be appointed to monitor the finances of the Toronto Humane Society. In his ruling (which does not yet appear to have been put online), the Honourable Mr. Justice Brown also ordered that the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals retain the control and care of the pets currently housed at the Humane Society. 

As some of you may recall, this past November the president of the Humane Society (who announced this week that he would resign) and four senior managers were arrested and charged with animal cruelty. In addition, the organization’s board of directors faces non-criminal charges. The matter is currently ongoing and no finding of guilt has been made against anyone involved.   

Apparently, in his ruling Justice Brown raised particular concern about legal fees the organization had incurred for seemingly non-essential reasons, unpaid hydro bills, incomplete financial statements, a decline in the value of its investments, and the fact that it had refused to disclose particulars regarding the liability insurance it carried for its directors and officers.

For those interested in the decision, generally court decisions are available on the website Canlii within a week or so of their release. 

In a statement, the Humane Society pledged to cooperate with the financial monitor and provide assistance in compiling the necessary financial information.   

Next up, Deloitte & Touche will provide the court with a preliminary report regarding the Humane Society’s finances and the court will hear argument about whether the organization’s board of directors should be removed and whether The Public Guardian and Trustee should conduct a formal investigation.

Have a great day!

Megan F. Connolly

Megan F. Connolly - Click here for more information on Megan Connolly.

Cost Recovery for In House Counsel

The recent decision of Grand & Toy v. Aviva Canada discussed whether a party, represented by salaried in-house counsel, could recover costs and, if so, to what extent. 

Aviva Canada had been successful in responding to a motion and was seeking the associated costs from Grand & Toy.  It had calculated the fees on the basis of $350 for the senior counsel on the file and $175 for the junior counsel. 

Grand & Toy took the position that as Aviva had been represented by its salaried, in-house counsel, to the extent a cost order was made, it should be on the basis of the actual costs incurred by the successful party – and this would involve Aviva disclosing the salaries of the in-house counsel, so a proper determination of actual cost could be made. 

The court rejected the argument that because in-house counsel was used, the type of cost order available was limited and pointed to s. 36 of the Solicitors Act, which provides that costs cannot be disallowed or reduced merely because the counsel involved are salaried employees of the party.  It found that in the circumstances it could not simply reduce a cost order that otherwise would have been made. 

Turning to the issue of quantum of fees, the court found that it should consider the factors enumerated in R. 57.01(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure(“Cost of Proceedings – General Principles”) and fix an amount that was fair and reasonable to the unsuccessful litigant (rather than that merely reflects the costs of the successful party). 

In this situation, the court determined that the hourly rates charged by counsel were too high given the complexity of the matter; that the time spent on some steps was excessive; and that one, rather than two, counsel from Aviva was all that was reasonably required for the hearing.  Accordingly, it awarded costs at a lesser amount than claimed. 

Have a great day!

Megan F. Connolly

Megan F. Connolly - Click here for more information on Megan Connolly.

Announcements - Hull on Estates and Succession Planning #192

Listen to: Announcements - Hull on Estates and Succession Planning #192

This week on Hull on Estates and Succession Planning, Ian and Suzana discuss Hull & Hull's most recent Breakfast Learning Series and the upcoming changes being made to the firms website. If you have any comments, send us an email at hullandhull@gmail.com or leave a comment on our blog.

Ian M. Hull - Click here for more information on Ian Hull.

Suzana Popovic-Montag - Click here for more information on Suzana Popovic-Montag.

Continue Reading...

Strategies for Headache-Free Estates

A recent article in the Financial Post, “Eight Tips for Feud-Free Estate Plans”, provides helpful advice on how to minimize family-infighting over one’s estate (or retirement) plan. 

The article is a must-read for anyone planning for the future as well as those who advise them. 

Here are a few of the tips that are offered:

1.      Give some thought to how you will fund future long term care

The idea of going to a retirement or care facility is something a lot of people don’t like to think about. However, this does not mean it will never happen – and if it does, the cost can be high. 

Longterm care insurance is offered by various companies and, for a relatively low premium, can provide the funding needed to pay for care costs when and if they arise.   

 

2.        If you own a vacation property, give special consideration to how it will be distributed on your death

 

Fights over a family cottage happen quite often and can easily result in lengthy and costly litigation. A frequent source of tension is when one sibling wants to keep the cottage in the family (“because that’s what mom would have wanted…”) while another sibling is happy to see it sold and to receive part of the proceeds. 

To avoid this it is worthwhile discussing with your children (if they are to be beneficiaries of your estate) what to do with the property before doing your will. 

 

3.      Make sure to keep your will up to date

 

You might be surprised how many people forget to change their wills when their circumstances change (for example, leaving gifts to three grandchildren, and neglecting to update the will when more grandchildren are born, leaving some out in the cold). 

Whenever your family structure changes (by birth, marriage, divorce, death) it would be worthwhile to contact the lawyer doing your will to see if revisions would be advisable. 

It is always suggested that you discuss your plans with those who will be affected – this is a good way to help avoid fighting down the road.

Have a great day!

Megan F. Connolly

Megan F. Connolly - Click here for more information on Megan Connolly.

A Devastating Inheritance: Huntington's Disease

Huntington’s disease (HD) is a progressive, degenerative brain disorder that causes certain nerve cells in the brain to waste away. Huntington’s is inherited, and if one of your parents has Huntington’s disease, you would have a 50% chance of getting the gene for the disease. Everyone who carries the gene will develop the disease. Since the HD gene was isolated in 1993, one can be tested to see if they are a carrier, however because there is no cure for HD, some people choose not to be tested.

About 1 in 10,000 Canadians has HD.

There are two types of HD: i) adult-onset, the most common form, with symptom onset in the mid 30s and 40s; and ii) early onset, which accounts for about 16% of all HD cases, with symptoms developing in childhood or adolescence.

Huntington’s disease is associated with three types of symptoms:

· Movement symptoms, referred to as chorea, which consist of jerking, involuntary movements (‘tics’) of the limbs, trunk or face;
· Cognitive symptoms including a gradual impairment of concentration, memory, judgment, reasoning, decision-making and learning. This cognitive decline starts in a very subtle fashion, but eventually results in dementia; and
· Psychiatric symptoms may include depression, and psychotic behaviours such as delusions, hallucinations, paranoia and inappropriate outbursts.

HD usually runs its course in about 10 to 30 years, with a strong correlation between an earlier onset and a more rapid progression of the disease.

Jennifer Hartman, Guest Blogger
 

Substantial Increase in Death from.....Watching TV?

I came across an article when thinking about blog topics for this week.   It appears that a recent Australian study from the Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute in the state of Victoria concluded that watching television can increase risk of death.

The study, published in Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association, followed the lifestyle habits of 8,800 adults who were age 25 or older at the commencement of the study. It was found that each hour spent in front of the TV daily increased the risk of dying earlier from cardiovascular disease, as well as creating a 9% higher risk of cancer related death.

 

Although the study focused on Television watching, it seems from the publication that the conclusions may be even more related to a sedentary lifestyle. While this may seem like a logical conclusion, this result is to be distinguished from any previous knowledge of the positive effects of a healthy active lifestyle. It appears that we now have evidence which assures us that spending time sitting, particularly in front of the television may cause additional harm to our bodies, even if we generally live an active lifestyle.

 

I can’t personally advocate on behalf of any of the articles to which I’ve referenced, but what I do know, is if there is any truth to the possibility that television viewing can shorten a life, it seems to be a pretty simple solution to get outside, enjoy the beautiful weekend forecast and go for a walk.

 

Have a nice weekend, thanks for reading,

Nadia

Nadia M. Harasymowycz - Click here for more information on Nadia Harasymowycz.

Jimi Hendrix to Release a New Album

Jimi Hendrix's family and Sony Commercial Music Group have collaborated and the result is a new album featuring Hendrix music.  Mark this day in your calendar as this album should hit the stores on March 9, 2010.


The Hendrix legacy is closely protected by Experience Hendrix LLC, a family run company, currently being run by Janie Hendrix, Jimi's sister.  She has indicated that the Estate 'had enough material for "a decade's worth" of new releases, both music and video.'  


The currently slated release will be titled "Valleys of Neptune", and will include never before heard recordings.  The music will mostly be taken from a four month studio session in 1969, a year before Hendrix died, at the young age of 27.


With his estate in possession of so much fresh artistic material, it looks like we may be able to look forward to many more Hendrix albums.  Shockingly, Hendrix may release more in death than in life.


Until Tomorrow,

Nadia

Nadia M. Harasymowycz - Click here for more information on Nadia Harasymowycz.
 

Kafka: A New Twist - The Unpublished Works

Franz Kafka left a will instructing his friend, Max Brod, to burn his manuscripts and not to publish them.  However, Brod spent much of his life editing Kafka's work for publication, making Kafka's writings into very influential pieces of fiction.  However, Brod's life work, and his alleged actions are currently under scrutiny in Israeli courts.


It appears that certain Kafka manuscripts have fallen into the hands of two sisters who received them from their mother.   Their mother, Esther Hoffe, received them from Max Brod, some 20 - 30 years after Kafka's death.   The sisters allegedly sold some manuscripts for millions of dollars and shared the profits with their mother.   Others purportedly remain in a safety deposit box.


This matter is currently before Israeli courts and it appears that there is some debate about the manner in which the manuscripts were received.  It further appears that true ownership of the documents is being contested, and the courts have given the parties involved, including the State of Israel and the National Library, an opportunity to settle this matter out of court.  The settlement deadline expired last week.  If the parties have not yet reached a settlement, the courts have indicated that they will order the safety deposit box where the manuscripts are being held to be opened, potentially damaging the manuscripts and reducing their value.


The outcome of this litigation will surely be interesting from an Estate perspective, but also may provide us with several new literary works from a truly famous author.   Only time will tell if the world will be gifted with such new works. 


Until Tomorrow,

Nadia

Nadia M. Harasymowycz - Click here for more information on Nadia Harasymowycz.
 

Civil Proceedings - Hull on Estates #196

Listen to: Civil Proceedings - Hull on Estates #196

This week on Hull on Estates, Paul Trudelle and Chris Graham discuss the amendments to civil procedure, effective January 1st, 2010.

If you have any comments, send us an email at hull.lawyers@gmail.com or leave a comment on our blog.

Paul E. Trudelle - Click here for more information on Paul Trudelle.

Christopher M.B. Graham - Click here for more information on Chris Graham.

 

Continue Reading...

Miep Gies - The Last Survivor of the Anne Frank Story, Dies at 100

Although the name "Miep Gies" may not be familiar to you, she was a key player in a story you almost certainly know.  Miep Gies, together with four others, provided a hiding spot for Anne Frank and her family as well as 4 others during WWII.  This act would have been enough to make her a hero.  Mrs. Gies' role did not stop there: without her help there is a good chance the world would never have seen Anne Frank's diaries published.  Mrs. Gies discovered Anne's diaries and gave them to Anne's father at the end of the war, allowing for their eventual publication.  


I am sure that, for many, reading Anne's diary was a memorable experience.  It certainly was for me.  So much so, that when I visited Amsterdam I sought out the Anne Frank Museum to view the hiding place which Mrs. Gies and her fellow protectors risked their lives for to provide to the Frank family.   It was a truly humbling experience.


Mrs. Gies was the last survivor of both the protectors of Anne and her family.  She was the last living connection to the 'Anne Frank story'.  While she maintained that her actions did not make her a hero, I beg to differ.  Her courage and thoughtfulness will live on forever through Anne's story, and although her passing is a true loss, it allows us to remember and once again reflect on her heroism. 
 

Until tomorrow, Nadia

Nadia M. Harasymowycz - Click here for more information about Nadia Harasymowycz.
 

When the Bottle Hits Back: Korsakoff's Syndrome

Korsakoff’s syndrome is a brain disorder usually associated with chronic, excessive alcohol consumption. At the physiological level, Korsakoff’s is caused by a thiamine (vitamin B1) deficiency, which ultimately affects the brain and the central nervous system. In the context of alcoholism, this thiamine deficiency comes about as a result of poor diet as well as an impeded ability of the stomach lining to absorb vitamins.

Korsakoff’s predominantly affects men between the ages of 45 and 65. Women tend to develop the disease at an earlier age than men. According to the Alzheimer’s Society UK, it takes about 20 years for the disease to develop in men, whereas it takes about half that time to develop in women.

At first glance, one with Korsakoff’s syndrome may appear fairly normal. An in-depth assessment, however, would reveal symptoms including:

· Memory loss, particularly of events post-onset of the disease;
· Impaired ability to acquire new information;
· Lack of insight into the condition;
· Perseveration (repetitive comments or questions);
· Eye movement disorders; and
· Confabulation, or ‘falsification of memory’ in which the sufferer makes up events to cover up their inability to remember events.

Once Korsakoff’s develops, recovery is unlikely, however the progression of the disease can be halted with abstinence from alcohol. Treatment for Korsakoff’s is comprised of thiamine therapy, as well as the administration of medications usually given to people with Alzheimer’s disease.

Jennifer Hartman, Guest Blogger
 

2010 Award of Excellence

Each year the Ontario Bar Association (OBA), Trusts and Estates Section, considers candidates for its Award of Excellence. Last year, the Section paid tribute to Barry Corbin as the recipient.

The Award for Excellence was created to recognize exceptional contributions and achievements by members of the OBA to the area of trusts and estates.

Any Trusts and Estates Section member of the OBA in good standing, as well as former members of the section who have retired or been appointed to the bench, but not including current officers of the Executive of the Trusts and Estates Section or the Executive of the OBA, are eligible to be nominated.

The criteria for the award is demonstrated leadership in the trusts and estates bar through knowledge, experience, skill, commitment, passion and strength of character, plus all or some of the following:

·         academic excellence through teaching at the Bar Admission Course, lecturing at a law school, participating in Continuing Legal Education and/or academic writing;

·         participation in the OBA Trusts and Estates Section Executive or the Law Society of Upper Canada on wills, trusts and estate matters; and

·         contribution to the development of wills, trusts and estate law.

Any member of the Trusts and Estates Section of the OBA in good standing is eligible to nominate a candidate by submission in writing, together with a curriculum vitae outlining the nominee's qualifications. The nominator must indicate that the candidate has been advised of the nomination prior to the nomination deadline and has consented thereto. The Award is typically presented at the Section’s Annual Awards dinner in late Spring.  

Nominations must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on Friday, January 22, 2010 to:

Peter Guennel, Sections Coordinator

Ontario Bar Association,

20 Toronto Street,

Suite 300,

Toronto, Ontario

M5C 2B8

Fax: 416-869-1390

For more information, and/or to obtain a Nomination Form, please contact Peter Guennel at (416) 869-1047, ext 340, or email at pguennel@oba.org or by visiting on line at http://www.oba.org/en/admin/awards_en/tru_award.aspx.

Thanks for reading.

Craig

Craig R. Vander Zee - Click here for more information on Craig Vander Zee.

The Evolution of Reading

I think it’s fair to say that the Internet has severely disrupted the traditional value chains in regards to how we obtain our media content. The value of content, starting with music, movies, TV shows, news and most recently books are being redefined for the Internet age.

I recently read an article published by the BBC News Magazine entitled “Page-turning Passion”, which details the culture of book reading and particularly how we have obtained and received the content from books. 

In the 1640s, books were more than just a tool to obtain information. It was a “treasured personal possession, and object whose loss would be keenly felt. To their privileged owners they were coveted objects, symbols of conspicuous consumption to be displayed alongside paintings, sculpture and silverware”.

Over time, manuscripts were replaced with printed books. Noticeably, printed books lacked that unique quality that gave each manuscript its touch of art. After all, printed books were simply copies produced on the production line. I am a product of the printed book era and have thoroughly enjoyed reading. I reject the idea that some have asserted indicating that printed books are impersonal volumes. As a reader, we find creative ways to make them ours, by underlining and highlighting in these books. I can dog ear pages if I want to.  I can rip out pages.  I can draw pictures in them

Now we have entered into a new era, the e-book era. If you have not yet heard of the Kindle, it is Amazon’s wireless reading device. The Kindle also has applications for most smart phones, which makes downloading and reading even more convenient and, unlike the 1640s, the Kindle is simply a tool to obtain information. 

Rush, scuttle and hurry seems to be the ear marks of today’s society. As an urban commuter, rarely do we have the time or the space to pull a book out while crammed onto a subway. Now it is as simple as purchasing a book while on my way to the subway and doing all of the reading off of the smart phone while I am on the subway.

There will always be advocates against the growth and importance of technology, but as an urban resident and a commuter, if it weren't for phone reading, I wouldn't be reading at all.

Thank you for reading,

Rick Bickhram

Rick Bickhram - Click here for more information on Rick Bickhram.

The Grim Toll of Alzheimer's

The Toronto Star recently reported on Alzheimer’s disease, stating that “cases of the mind-robbing disease will more than double to 1.25 million within 30 years as baby boomers age”. 

With the numbers pointing upward as the population grays, a recent report by the Alzheimer Society, entitled Rising Tide: The Impact of Dementia on Canadian Society suggests the following steps to help reduce the impact of dementia:

1.                  Prevention programs based on healthy diet and physical activity that can delay the onset of dementia by two years, with a potential cost saving of $219 billion over the 30-year period.

2.                  Enhanced skill-building and support programs for family caregivers, many of whom suffer financial hardship because they must leave jobs to look after a relative with dementia.

3.                  Assigning a case manager to each newly diagnosed dementia patient and their caregivers, which could help the person remain at home longer and lessen the strain on the long-term-care system.

Today, annual funding for Alzheimer’s is approximately $24 million. The Toronto Star reports that if “nothing changes, this sharp increase in the number of people living with dementia will mean that by 2038, the total costs associated with dementia will reach $153 billion a year”. 

We have already seen a substantial influx with respect to Will challenges, particularly because there has been a big question mark about the testator’s capacity. The grim realty is that this will be a continuing problem that Estate Solicitors are going to have to tackle.

Thank you for reading.

Rick Bickhram

Rick Bickhram - Click here for more information on Rick Bickhram.

Guardianship Applications - Hull on Estates #195

Listen to: Guardianship Applications - Hull on Estates #195

This week on Hull on Estates, Nadia Harasymowycz and Paul Trudelle discuss the costs involved in guardianship applications. If you have any comments, send us an email at hull.lawyers@gmail.com or leave a comment on our blog.

Nadia M. Harasymowycz - Click here for more information on Nadia Harasymowycz.

Paul E. Trudelle - Click here for more information on Paul Trudelle.

Continue Reading...

The 8 Life Stages of Estate Planning

As we are in the beginning of a new year, a quote from one of my favourite poets, T.S. Eliot, comes to mind:  “For last year's words belong to last year's language and next year's words await another voice.”  

I recently came across an article entitled "The 8 Life Stages of Estate Planning", authored by G.M. Filisko.  In his article, Mr. Filisko points out the obvious - during our life we will go through different phases and our estate plans should reflect these changes. Mr. Filisko lists the following stages to consider regardless of the phase one may be currently in:

1.      Young, single and carefree
2.      Single, but committed
3.      We’re Engaged
4.      Just Married
5.      The Joys of Parenting
6.      Divorce (if unfortunately applicable)
7.      The Middle Ages
8.      The Golden Years

Regardless of where one may fall in this spectrum, it is never to late to get started.

Since making New Year’s resolutions seems to be the theme around this time of the year, let’s make a resolution to be more organized this year and spend some time considering our estate plans.

Thank you for reading.

Rick Bickhram

Rick Bickhram - Click here for more information on Rick Bickhram.

Continue Reading...

Through the Looking Glass: Lewy Body Dementia

After Alzheimer’s Disease, Lewy body Dementia (LBD) is one of the leading causes of dementia in the elderly, accounting for up to 20% of cases of dementia.

In Lewy body Dementia, abnormal protein structures called Lewy bodies develop in regions of the brain responsible for thinking and movement. These Lewy bodies were first described in 1912 by Friederich Lewy, a colleague of Alois Alzheimer.

LBD symptoms closely resemble those of both Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. The Alzheimer’s-like symptoms of LBD include fluctuating levels of attention and alertness, and a progressive loss of memory, language, reasoning and higher mental functions such as calculation. The Parkinson’s-like symptoms of LBD include rigidity, stiffness, stooped posture and a shuffling gait. Complex, well-formed, but oddly unthreatening visual hallucinations are one of the earliest and most common (>80% incidence) symptoms of LBD and usually consist of people, children or animals.

Here are some more quick facts about LBD:

· LBD is slightly more common in men than women. The average age of onset is 75 to 80 years of age.
· There is no single test to diagnose LBD. Like Alzheimer’s disease, a diagnosis of LBD is considered ‘possible’ or ‘probable’ after other possible diagnoses are considered and eliminated.
· Lewy body Dementia usually has a rapid onset and rapid progression. The average span of time between diagnosis and death is about 5 to 7 years.
· There are no know therapies to slow the progression of LBD, nor is there a known cure. The goal of treatment is to control the cognitive, psychiatric and motor symptoms of the patient.

For additional information, click here for the Alzheimer Society of Canada or here for the Alzheimer Society of Toronto. The Lewy Body Dementia Association is also an excellent resource.

Jennifer Hartman, Guest Blogger
 

Legalese

Language is the primary tool of a lawyer’s trade. Although there has been movement in modern times toward “plain language”, history steeped in tradition demands that we maintain our own dictionary. Building on Wednesday’s theme of unusual legal terms, here are some you don’t hear every day.

Aliquot: Sounds like an exotic fruit but is actually a definite fractional share, usually applied when dividing and distributing a dead person's estate or trust assets.

Dynasty Trust: No, it is not a sequel to the 80’s TV series. It is a trust designed to pass down assets to U.S. beneficiaries for many generations in a manner that avoids U.S. transfer tax. For more general information see this Globe and Mail article.  

Emphyteusis: If you guessed a medical condition, deduct 2 points. This is a right subject to assignment and descent, charged on productive real estate. The person who has this right can enjoy the property on the condition of taking care of the estate or paying taxes or rent annually.

Hotchpot: This one has nothing to do with cooking. It is the blending and mixing of property belonging to different persons in order to divide it equally.  For more on hotchpot clauses, see this article by Corina Weigl.

Parricide: An act of killing one's father, a family member or close relative. Not recommended as a method to hasten one’s inheritance. 

Privileged Will: An informal will made by a soldier or a sailor, valid in spite of defect of form. Can be signed by, or on behalf and in the presence of, the soldier or sailor. No witness necessary. I’ll bet Captain High Liner has one of these. For more, see Rodney Hull & Ian Hull, “Probate Practice” 4th ed. (Toronto: Thomson Canada Limited, 1996) p. 74; Succession Law Reform Act, s. 5

Scrivener's Error: An error made by clerical staff in a legal document. This term is mainly used to save higher officials from the blame of committing a mistake by putting the blame on clerical staff instead. This one is just plain clever!

Usufruct: Not a sugar alternative but a sweet deal for the person who holds it. The right to use and enjoy the property of another for a stipulated time period or for life. No need to share with the real owner but you cannot alter, destroy or dispose of the property.

For definitions of these and other terms check out the law.com online legal dictionary.

Have a great weekend!

Sharon Davis

Sharon Davis - Click here for more information on Sharon Davis.

Living Wills and Powers of Attorney for Personal Care

A “Living Will” or “Advance Directive” is a document that indicates the grantor’s preferences with respect to health conditions and treatment, including the level of medical intervention. It is a guide for the person who must communicate with physicians and make health care decisions in the event the patient is not able to do so him or herself. It is different from a Power of Attorney for Personal Care, which is a document naming a specific person to act on your behalf.

An Advance Directive can be very detailed and tailored to the individual’s personal circumstances. For example, on the University of Toronto Centre for Bioethics website you can find information on a Cancer Specific Advance Directive

Given the complex medical nature, it may well be that the specifics of such a directive lay more comfortably in the bailiwick of the health care professional rather than the legal professional.  Ideally, the Power of Attorney for Personal Care should include a detailed health care directive. This approach offers the assurance that the grantor’s wishes are taken into account without the wording in the Advance Directive inadvertently voiding his or her Power of Attorney for Personal Care.

A Power of Attorney for Personal Care may also include conditions or restrictions other than Advance Directives such as limiting the attorney's ability to act until a confirmation of incapacity has been obtained, and determining the method of assessing capacity.

If a person becomes incapable of making personal care decisions and has no Guardian of the Person or Power of Attorney conferring the authority to make health care decisions, the Health Care Consent Act of Ontario provides a statutory hierarchy of persons who can provide consent on the incapable person's behalf in descending order of authority as follows:

  1. Spouse or partner
  2. Child or parent
  3. Brother or sister
  4. Any other relative

Therefore, it is especially important to prepare a Power of Attorney for Personal Care if you would not want your spouse, child or parent to make health care decisions on your behalf should you become unable to make them yourself.

For further information on this topic, see Q & A on Powers of Attorney and Living Wills by the Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee for Ontario, or this book about Living Wills by M. Dianne Godkin.

Thanks for reading.

Sharon Davis

Sharon Davis - Click here for more information on Sharon Davis.

Do you gazump?

As I was recently researching the duty of trustees, I stumbled upon a term that I might fully have expected to have found in a Dr. Seuss book rather than a legal text. I shall use it in the context in which it appears, as a subject title, although I doubt this will help you figure out what it means:

Dishonourable duty to “gazump” 

I found the whole passage so fascinating that I shall reproduce it for your enjoyment and potential enlightenment:

“Where trustees who have entered into negotiations for the sale of trust property receive a subsequent higher offer from another party they should at least probe the subsequent offer irrespective of questions of commercial morality which might have led a vendor who was not a trustee to close the deal with the original purchaser. Nevertheless, the trustees retain such a discretion as will allow them to act with proper prudence, and may pray in aid the commonsense rule underlying the old proverb “A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush”; so that there may be cases in which they could properly refuse a higher offer and proceed with a lower one.”

Underhill & Hayton, “The Law of Trusts and Trustees” (London: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2007) at page 716

Click here for the Wikipedia definition of gazumping and its opposite, gazundering (just for fun). Here is a link to a gazumping reference in a 2006 judgment, just in case you don’t believe me  - see paragraph 45. 

There are a couple of lessons to be learned here. The first is that not all legal terms need be Latin or pretentious-sounding. The second is that while the law may apparently foist a dishonourable duty upon (poor unsuspecting) trustees, if they happen to be holding a bird in one hand they will probably be okay. 

I’ll bet every Who in Whoville already knew that.

 Sharon Davis

Sharon Davis - Click here for more information on Sharon Davis.

Evidence Primer - Hull on Estates #194

Listen to: Evidence Primer - Hull on Estates #194

This week on Hull on Estates, Bianca La Neve and David Smith discuss evidentiary issues particularly the admissibility of business records.

If you have any comments, send us an email at hull.lawyers@gmail.com or leave a comment on our blog.

Bianca V. La Neve - Click here for more information on Bianca La Neve.

David Morgan Smith - Click here for more information on David Smith.

 

Continue Reading...

New Rules of Court for Ontario

 

As all litigators in the province of Ontario likely know by now, January 1, 2010 ushers in not only a new decade but New Rules of Civil Procedure. The New Rules apply to all matters, regardless of when they were commenced.

The amendments to the Rules effected by Ont. Reg. 438/08 are the most extensive and significant since the Rules were adopted in 1985. The fundamental goal of the reform is to make the civil justice system more affordable and accessible for Ontarians.

Some of the more significant changes are as follows:

Proportionality – In April of 2009 we saw a movement toward proportionality of time and expense with the interests at issue in estate litigation upon the introduction of the New Practice Direction for the Estates List of the Superior Court of Justice in Toronto. New Rule 1.04(1.1) brings this factor into play for litigation in all jurisdictions and mandates that Court Orders and Directions be proportionate to the importance and complexity of issues and amounts at stake.

Summary Judgment – Rule 20 expands the Court’s discretion to assess credibility, weigh evidence, conduct mini-trials with oral evidence, and award substantial indemnity costs against a party acting unreasonably or in bad faith.

Expert Evidence – Experts must provide fair objective and non-partisan opinion, give opinion evidence only on matters that are within their expertise, and assist the Court as reasonably required. This duty to the Court prevails over any obligation experts owe to the party who retained them. Expert reports must be filed 90 days before the pre-trial conference and responding expert reports must be served 60 days prior to the pre-trial conference.  

Discovery – Among the many changes regarding discovery is a new definition of relevance. The phrase “relating to any matter in issue in the action” has been replaced with “relevant to any matter in issue in the action”. This changes the test to one of simple relevance. Proportionality comes into play again in Rule 29.2, which sets out the considerations that must be made in determining questions to be answered or documents to be produced. Parties must agree to a written discovery plan (Rule 29.1) and there is a 7-hour time limit on oral examinations for discovery (R. 31.05.1).

Time – Calculation of time pursuant to Rule 3.01(1)(b) for notice periods of 7 days or less excludes holidays. There are also earlier deadlines for service and filing of materials for motions (Rule 37) Applications (Rule 38) and appeals from interlocutory orders (Rule 61).    

If your New Year’s resolution is to learn the New Rules and their impact on your estates practice, you should attend the OBA Trusts and Estates Section Seminar, "Stay on top of the New Rules of court" on January 6, 2010.

Program Chair, Jane Martin, and speakers,  Mr. Justice David M. Brown and Madam Justice Lois B. Roberts of the Superior Court of Justice, and Hull & Hull’s own Suzana Popovic-Montag, will guide you through the changes and provide an opportunity to ask questions regarding implications for estates practitioners.

For more on this topic see Gary Watson’s summary of the amendments and Marni Pernica’s recent article in OBA’s Deadbeat magazine.  Previous Hull & Hull commentary by Rick Bickhram and Paul Trudelle can be found here and here.

I suspect that following the New Rules is one Resolution you will be sure to keep!

Sharon Davis

Sharon Davis - Click here for more information about Sharon Davis.

 

Pseudodementia

Pseudodementia is a dementia syndrome which resembles dementia, but is actually the result of an underlying psychiatric disorder, most often depression. While the presentation of pseudodementia in the elderly varies widely, it closely mimics dementia in that common symptoms include:

· poor attention and concentration;
· a reduction in speed of cognitive response;
· compromised problem-solving and decision-making; and
· impaired immediate recall.

The two identifying hallmarks of pseudodementia are: i) there is no known neurological condition to otherwise explain the symptoms and ii) the cognitive deficits show considerable improvement, or even reverse, when the psychiatric illness is treated.

The concept of pseudodementia is a controversial one, in that it is considered a ‘soft diagnosis’, as there are no explicit diagnostic criteria; a physician’s checklist, if you will. There is no validated test, or group of tests to differentiate depression-related cognitive dysfunction from degenerative conditions such as Alzheimer’s Disease. Compounding the confusion surrounding pseudodementia is the fact that depression is frequent in patients with irreversible dementia. As a result, pseudodementia is often misdiagnosed as simply ‘true’ dementia.

In the context of estates litigation, a diagnosis of pseudodementia has the potential to significantly change the landscape of a capacity challenge. As an example, an article in the Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law describes a nearly successful attempt to defraud a patient of their estate during her ‘presumed’ dementia, when in fact, she suffered from pseudodementia from which she later made a dramatic recovery.

Jennifer Hartman, Guest Blogger