Not So Fast...

The notion of being buried alive has no doubt been the subject of suspense thrillers and horror films past, probably because it generates the reaction movie makers want – fear. 

Well, this fictional terror almost became a reality for a 45 year-old Colombian woman recently declared dead of a heart attack. Luckily for her, she moved one of her arms just as an undertaker was about to embalm her.

The patient has multiple sclerosis, and was admitted to hospital a couple of days earlier after a heart attack.  Reportedly, she survived for several hours on life support, but then seemingly didn't respond to resuscitation efforts following a second attack.  She was declared dead not long after that.

A few hours after the pronouncement, a funeral home employee was about to inject embalming fluid into her body when he saw her move. He stopped the procedure and brought her back to the hospital to be treated.  

The reported medical opinion is that on rare occasions a person's heart rate and breathing can drop to undetectable levels, leading doctors to erroneously declare a patient dead. Pretty scary stuff!

Being buried alive would definitely be ranked up there with one of my worst nightmare scenarios.  Thankfully this woman was spared a similar fate! 

Don’t think I’ll be watching any horror flicks this weekend,   

Natalia Angelini

Natalia R. Angelini - Click here for more information on Natalia Angelini.

A Family at War

Although it seems that I hear of a new tale of familial strife weekly in this practice, I still find myself surprised and saddened to learn of each new account. One such case takes us to England, where it was recently reported that the daughters of a millionaire farmer are accused by their brothers to have plied their father with whisky and sleeping tablets before making him sign a Will leaving the sisters £600,000. At the time, their father, 89, was apparently grieving for his wife, who had died days earlier after a 65-year marriage. He was also possibly suffering from Alzheimer's.

The brothers’ version of events paints a picture of a man in a weakened condition being taken advantage of in a grief-stricken state. In contrast, the sisters explain that their father was a stubborn man who knew what he was doing and who wanted to treat all his children equally (he had already apparently left land worth an equivalent amount to his sons).

Both sides called expert medical witnesses, with doctors offering different opinions over the testator’s capacity. In addition, others close to the deceased gave evidence of their observations of him. Notably, the Will was drawn up by a solicitor who had acted for the father for many years, who testified that he had the necessary capacity and knew and approved of the Will’s contents. 

If the brothers’ case is successful, the court will uphold a prior Will in which they will inherit most of the £1.2million estate. Their sisters, in contrast, will each receive only £15,000.

While the outcome of this case is not yet known, to me it highlights the importance of gathering evidence to support one’s position in this type of litigation. As a deceased loved one is unable to offer up assistance from the grave, medical evidence, lawyer’s evidence and the evidence of people close to a testator are often all necessary to help put the pieces of the puzzle together.

Have a good day,

Natalia Angelini

Natalia R. Angelini - Click here for more information on Natalia Angelini.

The Effect of Divorces on Gifts to Spouses in a Will

In Ontario, the law is that a Will is revoked by marriage (for exceptions, see section 16 of the Succession Law Reform Act (SLRA)). 

If after a testator makes a Will he or she divorces or the marriage is declared a nullity, (a) a gift in a Will of property to one’s former spouse; (b) an appointment of one’s former spouse as executor or trustee; and (c) the conferring of a general or special power of appointment on one’s former spouse, are revoked. The Will is construed as if the former spouse had died before the testator (see section 17(2) of the SLRA). Notably, this law does not apply if a contrary intention appears in the Will.

Divorced couples (or the other beneficiaries under their Will) can take comfort in knowing that they won't be surprised by having a gift no longer intended for a former spouse honoured, which could otherwise reduce the entitlement of others named in the Will.   

As reported in the February 2010 edition of Will Power, until not so long ago the common law in Nova Scotia lead to a very different result.  A gift by Will to one’s spouse was construed prima facie to refer to the person to whom the individual was married at the time the Will was made, unless circumstances showed that a future spouse was intended. If the individual was later divorced or the marriage was later annulled, this event had no effect on the gift made in the Will. To the likely chagrin of the divorced testator, unless the Will was changed after the divorce, his or her former spouse would still get the gift on the testator's death.

That has all changed with the coming into force of section 19A of the Nova Scotia Wills Act. This legislation brings the law in Nova Scotia in line with that of Ontario and some other provinces. It is good to see growing uniformity being applied in Canada on this issue.

Enjoy the rest of your day,

Natalia Angelini

Natalia R. Angelini - Click here for more information on Natalia Angelini.

Estate Trustee Appointment - Hull on Estates #200

Listen to: Estate Trustee Appointment - Hull on Estates #200

This week on Hull on Estates, Natalia Angelini and Paul Trudelle discuss conflicting applications to apply for an appointment as Estate Trustee without a Will.

If you have any comments, please email us at hull.lawyers@gmail.com or leave us a comment on our blog.

Natalia R. Angelini - Click here for more information on Natialia Angelini.

Paul E. Trudelle - Click here for more information on Paul Trudelle.

Continue Reading...

Planned Giving - Part 2 - Hull on Estates and Succession Planning #196

Listen to: Planned Giving - Part 2 - Hull on Estates and Succession Planning #196

This week on Hull on Estates and Succession Planning, Ian Hull continues his discussion from last week on Planned Giving.

If you have any comments, please email us at hullandhull@gmail.com or leave us a comment on our blog,

Ian M. Hull - Click here for more information on Ian Hull.

Continue Reading...

Admission to a Psychiatric Facility under the Ontario Mental Health Act

Yesterday’s blog spoke to the issue of an Application for Psychiatric Assessment (Form 1) under the Mental Health Act R.S.O. 1990. To review, upon completion of the psychiatric assessment, the patient must either be released or admitted as an involuntary patient, a voluntary patient, or an informal patient.

Involuntary Patient: Before you become an involuntary patient, a doctor must assess you and place you on a Form 3 (Certificate of Involuntary Admission), which lasts for two weeks. The Mental Health Act speaks very specifically to the legal criteria that must be met in order for such a Certificate to be completed. An involuntary patient is not permitted to leave the hospital or psychiatric facility.

Voluntary Patient: There is no portion of the Mental Health Act that authorizes a psychiatric facility to detain a voluntary patient. In this regard, a voluntary patient can leave the facility at any time, as long as they do not pose a risk to themselves or others. If they were to be identified as posing a risk to themselves or others, then they must be made an involuntary patient (by means of a Form 3) in order to be detained.

Informal Patient: An informal patient is either a child under the age of 16 years, or someone who is incapable of making treatment decisions for themselves (as defined by the Health Care Consent Act) and who therefore has been admitted to the facility under the consent of another person (i.e. ‘substitute decision-maker’; usually a concerned family member). The informal patient cannot be held against their will in the hospital, however, an informal patient can be made ‘involuntary’ if a doctor deems that a Form 3 is necessary.

Jennifer Hartman, Guest Blogger


 

Application by Physician for Psychiatric Assessment under the Ontario Mental Health Act: The Form 1

Under the Ontario Mental Health Act, a Form 1 refers to an Application by Physician for Psychiatric Assessment, or APA.  A Form 1 allows a doctor to hold a patient in a hospital or psychiatric facility for up to 72 hours in order to complete a psychiatric assessment.  In order to sign a Form 1, the doctor must have examined the patient within the 7 day period prior to the Form 1 being signed, after which the Form 1 expires.  In addition, the doctor must find that the patient meets one of two sets of criteria, depending on whether or not they are deemed capable of consenting to treatment in a psychiatric facility within the meaning of the Health Care Consent Act

The physician’s clinical opinion can, in consideration of what is appropriate in the circumstances, be based on their own observations, or in combination with facts communicated to the physician by others (e.g. family members, friends).

Once the Form 1 has been signed, anyone can bring (or force) the person into a psychiatric facility for assessment within the 7 day period before the Form 1 expires.  Upon completion of the psychiatric assessment, the patient must either be released, or admitted as an involuntary patient, a voluntary patient or an informal patient.  Tomorrow’s blog posting will explore these options in greater detail.

Jennifer Hartman, Guest Blogger

Coping with the Demands of an Aging Population

Both the British and Canadian Governments have, in recent days, been urged to direct their attention to the impending costs of providing for the long-term care of their aging populations. 

In a Report released yesterday, parliamentary "budget watchdog" Kevin Page raised a warning of the impending cost to Canada.  In its review of the report, the Globe & Mail noted that "the year 2011 is the beginning of what has been called a "demographic time bomb" for Canada: an explosion of the 65-plus population over two decades coupled with a sharply declining proportion of Canadians in the work force as boomers retire....The number of workers supporting each elderly Canadian is expected to dwindle to 2.5 to one in 2030 from five to one today because of this country's low birth rate, rising life expectancy and aging boomers."

And in the United Kingdom, the BBC notes that the Audit Commission has urged the adoption of innovative means of providing services, particularly by embracing technology, in an attempt to lower the financial burden on government.  It highlighted a number of examples of how "telecare" was being used to provide such things as electronic links between services and people living in their own homes (Lifeline in Canada is such an example), and the fitting of exit sensors, fall detectors and flood alerts to monitor vulnerable people in their own homes.  The increased involvement of neighbours was also proposed as another solution to the growing demands.

Have a great weekend.

David Morgan Smith

David Morgan Smith - Click here for more information about David Smith.

 

When Unfinished Business and Legal Uncertainty Collide

Recently on our website, Bianca La Neve blogged on the uncertainty surrounding the U.S. Death Tax and Jennifer Hartman blogged on Nabokov's unfinished work "Laura" which the author had wanted destroyed but which his executor published anyway. 

One would be forgiven for thinking the two blogs could not possibly have anything to do with one another. 

But the recent death of J.D. Salinger, notoriously reclusive author of "Catcher in the Rye," has caused at least one commentator to consider the dilemma posed to the estate of a deceased author in the context of the legal uncertainty that Bianca recounted in her blog.  As Richard A. Behrendt, self-described "tax geek" observes (as quoted in Floyd Norris's blog posted on the New York Times website on January 29, 2010):

"Many have predicted that the representatives of the estate of someone who dies [during the period between January 1, 2010 and the date of implementation of any retroactive death tax] would mount a constitutional challenge to the retroactivity of the law.... Another unique issue [with respect to Salinger's estate] is valuation. Some reports have hinted that Salinger had anywhere from 2 to 15 unpublished novels in his safe. Not to suggest that there is an unpublished “Catcher in the Rye” lying around (which has sold 60 million copies), but the possibility raises some really interesting valuation questions, namely, how much is an unpublished Salinger novel worth for federal estate tax purposes?"

For another interesting consideration of Salinger's estate from an estate law perspective see this link.

David Morgan Smith

David Morgan Smith - Click here for more information on David Smith.

 

Planned Giving - Part 1 - Hull on Estates and Succession Planning #195

Listen to: Planned Giving - Part 1 - Hull on Estates and Succession Planning #195

This week on Hull on Estates and Succession Planning, Ian talks about the new series he and Suzana will be starting on the podcast: planned giving.

If you have any comments, please email us at hullandhull@gmail.com or leave us a comment on our blog.

Ian M. Hull - Click here for more information on Ian Hull.

Continue Reading...

Sibling Rivalry - Hull on Estates #199

Listen to: Sibling Rivalry - Hull on Estates #199

This week on Hull on Estates, Sharon Davis and David Smith discuss sibling rivalry.

If you have any comments, please email us at hull.lawyers@gmail.com or leave us a comment on our blog.

Sharon Davis - Click here for more information on Sharon Davis.

David M. Smith - Click here for more information on David Smith.

 

 

Continue Reading...

The Role of the Children's Lawyer in Settlements Involving Minors

I recently read an article composed by The Children’s Lawyer, Debra Stephens, named Minor Settlements: How to Ensure Court Approval. I found this article to be particularly helpful as the article speaks to the role of The Children’s Lawyer in litigious matters and explains the common issues that arise during settlements involving minors.

Fundamentally, it is important to understand the role of The Children’s Lawyer with respect to their involvement in settlements concerning minors, which Ms. Stephens describes as: “The Children’s Lawyer is not a party to the proceeding and is not in an adversarial role with any of the parties. Rather, The Children’s Lawyer acts as an advisor to the court, making recommendations to assist the judge in determining whether to approve the proposed settlement”.

In her article, Ms. Stephens talks about a few issues that commonly arise during settlements involving minors. One of those issues that Ms. Stephens touches on is legal fees. Ms. Stephens states that legal fees are an important factor in determining whether to approve a settlement on behalf of a minor. Factors that are relied on when considering the reasonableness of a solicitor’s account are set out in the Court of Appeal decision Cohen v. Kealey and Blaney and include:

1.                  time spent;

2.                  legal complexity;

3.                  degree of responsibility assumed by the lawyers;

4.                  monetary value of the matter in issue;

5.                  the importance of the matters to the client;

6.                  degree of skill of the lawyers, results achieved;

7.                  ability of the client to pay; and

8.                  expectation of the client with respect to the fee. 

Also, another factor not mentioned in the case above is ensuring that access to justice is obtained for parties under a disability. I found Ms. Stephens’ article to be particularly useful in my practice and I would certainly recommend it to any practitioner who ordinarily runs into issues involving The Children’s Lawyer.

Thank you for reading.

Rick Bickhram

Rick Bickhram - Click here for more information on Rick Bickhram.

Unworthy to Inherit

As most of us return to our offices from a long weekend, I would like to share with you an interesting case, which I read over the weekend and deals with an Application to declare a family member unworthy to inherit. S.R. (Succession de), 2008 QCCS 4015, is a decision released by the Quebec Superior Court.

In, S.R. (Succession de), the Deceased was survived by his spouse and four children.    The Deceased was a savvy businessman who, during his lifetime, was quite successful. In 1995, the Deceased asked a notary to prepare a Will. A draft Will was sent to the Deceased for his review but it appears that he never executed the Will. In 2000, the Deceased was diagnosed with cancer and subsequently died in 2003.

After the Deceased died, the children looked for their father’s Will in the home and at the Deceased’s office with no success. We are given to understand that all of the children, searched, under the bed, every closet, every brief case belonging to the Deceased, but were unable to recover a Will.   

One of the daughters prepared a proposal requesting the siblings to acknowledge that the Deceased promised to transfer a certain property to her. This would have the effect of increasing her entitlement under the Deceased’s estate. Her siblings refused to sign the acknowledgement, which led to the ensuing dispute. The disgruntled daughter, subsequently informed everyone that she had in fact, located a Will of the Deceased in an old briefcase, which was allegedly in the bedroom closet of the Deceased’s residence.

The discovered Will was similar to the draft Will prepared earlier, except that it included two additional provisions which favoured the disgruntled daughter, in the amount of $2.4 million dollars and was apparently executed by two witnesses from New York. 

The disgruntled daughter tried to probate this Will, but it was contested by her siblings and it was ultimately ruled that the Will could not be probated by the Honourable Justice Gagnon. Justice Gagnon held that there were all the sorts of question marks surrounding the validity and execution of the Will. 

After the Application for probate was refused, the disgruntled daughter then produced a document which was a blank cheque allegedly signed by the Deceased and which purported to give the disgruntled daughter her share in a building that she coveted and various other monies for her home. The siblings refused to admit the authenticity of the blank cheque and commenced proceedings against the disgruntled daughter to have her declared unworthy to inherit under the Deceased’s estate. 

Under the section 621 of the Civil Code of Quebec, it states that a person “may be declared unworthy of inheriting where a person is guilty of cruelty towards the deceased, and where the person has concealed, altered or destroyed in bad faith the Will of the deceased, or a person who has hindered the testator in the writing, amending or revoking of their Will.” 

In relying on this provision, the children advocated that the disgruntled should be precluded from inheriting because she concealed and altered, in bad faith the alleged Will of the Deceased. 

The court held that the disgruntled daughter had likely altered the Deceased’s Will, had taken the draft prepared by the notary and added some typewritten additions that benefited her to the detriment of her siblings and mother. The court further held that the disgruntled daughter likely had taken the blank cheque from the Deceased’s home and also forged that after his death.

Accordingly, the disgruntled daughter was declared unworthy to inherit and her claims against the estate were dismissed.

An interesting point, in Ontario we do not have any similar case law or legislation that would actually allow someone to commence a proceeding, seeking to have someone else precluded from receiving their entitlement absent criminal activity such as murder.

Have a great day,

Rick Bickhram

Rick Bickhram - Click here for more information on Rick Bickhram.

 

What Do You Do With Grandma's Stockpiles of Teacups and Trinkets?

When loved ones pass away, family members and estate trustees are often faced with sorting through and disposing of personal possessions stockpiled over a lifetime. Sometimes, it will be obvious that certain possessions hold monetary value, such as a painting from one of the Group of Seven. The local auction house will gladly sell such valuable pieces for you. Other times, though, less obvious things such as handwoven baskets can also fetch a handsome price. How does one know which personal items are valuable and which are not? Unfortunately, for 2010, the Antiques Roadshow will not be travelling to any Canadian cities.

Fortunately, there are many antiques experts who will assess and dispose of personal possessions. A recent article in the National Post newspaper highlighted the use of such antiques experts who will assess all of the contents of a decedent’s home, and then dispose of the goods through various channels such as estate sales and eBay. A Toronto-based company, EstateNet.ca, promises personalized services customized for each client. As noted on their website, they will examine every closet, drawer and storage space to clean, sort, identify and organize all personal items. They will research the market status of special items. Once the contents have been itemized, a pricing schedule is set. EstateNet uses a two-stage sales process: advance selling, followed by an on-site public sale. You can read more about the company, their services, and testimonials from happy customers on their website. 

Bianca La Neve

Bianca V. La Neve - Click here for more information on Bianca La Neve.

The U.S. Death Tax is Dead! Will it be Resurrected?

The United State’s federal estate tax, more commonly known as the “Death Tax” is a tax applied to the transfer of a person’s assets at death. It is defined by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service as “a tax on your right to transfer property at your death.”

The Death Tax is paid by the recipients of an inheritance and is due within 9 months of the decedent’s death.   If there is not sufficient cash in the estate, personal property and business assets must be sold to pay the tax. 

As noted in one of our prior blogs, due to changes made by Congress during the George Bush administration back in 2001, the Death Tax was due to fall from 45% to 0% on January 1, 2010.  Many thought this loophole would be addressed before the start of the year. However, due to a Congressional tax standoff, no action was taken in time and the Death Tax has been repealed. However, the repeal is not permanent and the Death Tax is scheduled to be resurrected on January 1, 2010, at a rate of 55% on all assets above $1 million (the current exemption amount). 

It remains to be seen which way the political winds will blow, as Congress will likely address the issue this year. In the interim, estate planners in the U.S. are in uncharted territory, as no one can predict whether/when the Death Tax will be resurrected and if so, whether Congress will make it retroactive to the beginning of the year. This may ultimately be a matter for the courts to decide. Stay tuned!

Bianca La Neve

Bianca V. la Neve - Click here for more information on Bianca La Neve.

Guardianship Applications - Hull on Estate and Succession Planning #194

Listen to: Guardianship Applications - Hull on Estate and Succession Planning #194

This week on Hull on Estates and Succession Planning, Ian and Suzana talk about taking a non-contentious step toward obtaining a guardianship application. 

If you have any comments, send us an email at hullandhull@gmail.com or leave us a comment on our blog.

Ian M. Hull - Click here for more information on Ian Hull.

Suzana Popovic-Montag - Click here for more information on Suzana Popovic-Montag.

Continue Reading...

Will Interpretation - Hull on Estates #198

Listen to: Will Interpretation - Hull on Estates #198

This week on Hull on Estates, Ian Hull and Suzana Popovic-Montag discuss Will interpretation.

If you have any comments, email us at hull.lawyers@gmail.com or leave us a comment on our blog.

Ian M. Hull - Click here for more information on Ian Hull.

Suzana Popovic-Montag - Click here for more information on Suzana Popovic-Montag.

 

 

 

Continue Reading...

Sibling Rivalry and Caring for Elderly Parents

In her new book, They're Your Parents, Too!: How Siblings Can Survive Their Parents' Aging Without Driving Each Other Crazy, journalist Francine Russo writes about a difficult stage of life: the “twilight transition” when boomer-aged siblings reunite to care for aging parents. This period is laden with new challenges – dividing assets, dementia, caregiving issues - and has the potential to inflame old sibling rivalries as adult siblings deal with the end of their first family and take over their parents’ place as the decision-making generation. As noted by Ms. Russo in a recent interview with The Globe and Mail: “There’s a huge re-emergence of sibling rivalry over parents because when we see that our parents’ time is limited, all the unmet needs we’ve had resurface: to be loved, approved of, forgiven….”

In her book, Ms. Russo interviewed siblings, gerontologists, family therapists, elder-care attorneys, financial planners, and health workers to offer practical advice on such topics as:

-          the negotiation of caregiving issues and dealing with unequal contributions or power struggles;

-          the making of major medical and financial decisions, when parents cannot;

-          how to cope with unresolved childhood rivalries and hurts; and

-          tips for avoiding conflict.

Click here to read Ms. Russo’s interview in Monday’s edition of The Globe and Mail.

Bianca La Neve

Bianca V. La Neve - Click here for more information on Bianca La Neve.

The Good Government Act, 2009: Reform to the Regulation of Charities

As I noted yesterday, Ontario’s Good Government Act 2009 has received royal assent. Over 300 pieces of legislation have been amended or repealed, including various statutes dealing with the regulation of charities in Ontario.  

Of particular note are the following two changes:

1.    The Charitable Gifts Act (the “CGA”) has been repealed. This Act has long been criticized for unnecessarily restricting the ability of charities from directly or indirectly owning more than a 10% interest in a business, particularly as the Income Tax Act already imposes various restrictions on registered charities conducting business activities. The repeal of the CGA may be a welcome change to Ontario charities wishing to acquire an interest in a business for investment purposes. 

2.    An amendment to the Charities Accounting Act (“CAA”) relates to the section dealing with interests in real or personal property held for a charitable purpose. Historically, the CAA restricted the ownership of real estate by an Ontario charity by requiring that land could only be held to the extent that it was used for the charitable purpose. A charity could not own excess land and lease it out. Any excess property was subject to vesting in the Public Guardian and Trustee. The amended section now simply provides that a charity that holds an interest in real or personal property for a charitable purpose shall use the property for the charitable purpose. This amendment will presumably allow charities to hold excess property, both real or personal, and invest such property in order to earn income. 

For a more fulsome discussion of the effect of the Good Government Act, 2009 on charities, see Miller Thomson’s informative newsletter.

Bianca La Neve

Bianca V. La Neve - Click here for more information on Bianca La Neve.

The Good Government Act, 2009

On December 15, 2009, the Good Government Act, 2009 received royal assent. This statute amended or repealed over 300 pieces of legislation, ranging from the Accumulations Act to the Off-Road Vehicles Act. There are various amendments that should be of particular interest to those of us who practice estate, capacity and trust litigation.

The Crown Administration of Estates Act is amended by adding a new section 5.1, dealing with the enforceability of compensation agreements. A “compensation agreement” is defined to mean an agreement with an heir of an estate that provides for compensation, directly or indirectly, to one or more persons or entities on the location, recovery or distribution of any interest in the estate to which the heir may be entitled. In cases of estates administered by the Public Guardian and Trustee, there must be fair disclosure before a possible heir is asked to sign a compensation agreement. In addition, there is a cap on compensation of 10 per cent of the value of the possible heir’s interest in the estate. Click here for the complete text of the Act.

The Health Care Consent Act, 1996 is amended to increase the time allowed, from two days to four days, for the Consent and Capacity Board to issue written reasons for decisions. In addition, the Act is amended to allow the Board to direct Legal Aid Ontario (instead of the Public Guardian and Trustee or the Office of the Children’s Lawyer) to arrange for legal representation for a person who may be incapable with respect to a treatment, managing property, admission to a care facility or a personal assistance service. Click here for the complete text of this Act.

Bianca La Neve

Bianca V. La Neve - Click here for more information on Bianca La Neve.

The Search for Lost Art Revisited

“He who touches the ashes of the past,
Will burn himself with still glowing coals.” 
--Elizabeth Heyking

Han Sachs invoked this quote in his autobiographical work: "The World’s Greatest Poster Collection: How it came into being and How it Disappeared From the Face of the Earth."  As the title of his book suggests, Sachs (who was, among other things, Einstein's dentist) compiled an invaluable poster collection that was confiscated by the Nazis in November, 1938.  He died without ever recovering his treasured collection.

In a recent essay published in the Timesonline, his great-granddaughter recounts the subsequent efforts made by Sachs' son to recover his late father's collection.  Despite the fact that Germany: (i) committed to return confiscated art found in museums by signing the Washington Conference Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art in 1999, and (ii) where the Third Reich was implicated, implied that it would not invoke any statute of limitations, a recent Court decision in favour of the estate was nonetheless appealed by the German government and the decision is pending.

The efforts of an executor of an estate to recover lost art poses special challenges that I recounted in this blog reviewing the efforts of the estate trustees of the estate of Max Stern and the advent of the Lost Art Internet Database.   

David M. Smith 

David M. Smith - Click here for more information on David Smith.

The Executor: Whose Choice?

Testators choose their executors.  The choice of executor is commonly assumed to be a very personal choice predicated on trustworthiness.  But in the face of this assumption, can the beneficiaries of an estate ever agree amongst themselves to oust an executor in the absence of any recognized basis for removal?  A pending case in the U.K., as reported in The TimesOnline, addresses this question.

A firm named Will Drafters in the U.K. was named executor in the Will of a deceased.  The beneficiaries named in the Will are not happy with the compensation Will Drafters is entitled to under its contract with the testator.  The beneficiaries have brought this so-called "test case" to see if the Court will order the removal of the named executor based simply on the fact that all beneficiaries seek its removal in favour of another company, Final Duties, which will apparently charge a lesser rate of compensation.  Not surprisingly, Will Drafters takes the position that they contracted with the testator for their services at an agreed rate of compensation and ought not to be removed. Certainly there is no indication that there are any of the factors that give rise to the removal of an executor (in Ontario, this would proceed under s.37 of the Trustee Act)

Quite apart from the legal issue of when the Court ought to remove an executor, the case has sparked a debate respecting whether "will-writing companies" (as they are called in the U.K.) such as Will Drafters and Final Duties, ought to be regulated. As the Times notes: "The only will-writing association to offer accreditation — the Fellowship of Professional Willwriters and Probate Practitioners — says that its research shows that two thirds of people wrongly thought the willwriters they used were all trained solicitors. A recent report on regulation of legal services by Lord Hunt of the Wirral expressed concern about the “fringe legal market” in will-writing, probate and claims handling."

On a final note, to all who read yesterday's blog, please see this link for a revised version of that blog now posted in its place on our website

David M. Smith

David M. Smith - Click here for more information on David Smith.

 

 

Abatement and Ademption: More Challenges for the Executor of a Cash-Strapped Estate

What follows is a revised edition of this morning's blog which inadvertently created confusion between the principles of Abatement and Ademption. I apologise for any confusion caused by the initial version.

On Monday, I blogged on the payment of debts of an estate and the steps that an estate trustee ought to take to protect him or herself from any personal liability.  Today's blog is a sequel of sorts (it would have been posted yesterday but a Groundhog Day tie-in was too good to resist).

The issue today is Ademption and Abatement, words that will only be found in a law dictionary.  Ademption occurs when a specific gift of personal or real property in a Will is no longer in existence at the date of death, in which case the gift fails.  If specific legacies of cash can be partially satisfied (as detailed below) from the funds remaining in the estate after payment of debts, then there is an Abatement of such legacies.

For greater clarity, where there are debts to be paid, the residuary beneficiaries take the hit first. If the debts can be paid and still leave something in the residue, than the specific cash legacies can be paid in full.  However, when the residue is exhausted by the payment of debts, and there is a shortfall between the amount remaining and the amount required to fully fund the specific cash legacies, the principle of abatement dictates that these legacies are reduced on a pro rata basis.

The situation gets considerably more complicated if an executor is faced with a cash poor estate and a Will that contains combinations of cash legacies, gifts of real estate, gifts of personal property, and gifts of personal bank accounts (sometimes called general or demonstrative legacies).  In such a case, good legal advice is critical.

David M. Smith

David M. Smith - Click here for more information on David Smith.

 

Power of Attorney - Hull on Estates #197

Listen to: Power of Attorney - Hull on Estates #197

This week on Hull on Estates, Natalia Angelini and Nadia Harasymowycz discuss when Power of Attorney should be executed. 

If you have any comments, send us an email at hull.lawyers@gmail.com or leave a comment on our blog.

Natalia R. Angelini - Click here for more information on Natalia Angelini.

Nadia M. Harasymowycz - Click here for more information on Nadia Harasymowycz.

Continue Reading...

Limited Power of Attorney - Hull on Estates and Succession Planning #193

Listen to: Limited Power of Attorney - Hull on Estates and Succession Planning #193

This week on Hull on Estates and Succession Planning, Ian and Suzana discuss the issues with having a limited Power of Attorney or no Power of Attorney at all.

If you have any comments, send us an email at hullandhull@gmail.com or leave a comment on our blog.

Ian M. Hull - Click here for more information on Ian Hull.

Suzana Popovic-Montag - Click here for more information on Suzana Popovic-Montag.

 

 

Continue Reading...

Groundhog Day: A Time to Reflect

Every year on Groundhog Day I can't help but reflect on Bill Murray and his contribution to the modern North American psyche.  It must be a massive ego trip to know that, on one day of the year, most everyone reflects on a movie that you have made.  With all due apologies to Punxsutawney Phil and Ontario's own Wiarton Willie, Bill Murray is to Groundhog Day what Cupid is to Valentine's Day (that other February distraction).  And you can't escape him.  Groundhog Day (the movie) is played endlessly in syndication (especially on, well, Groundhog Day) unrivaled in its mind-numbing repetition except by the inescapable "Bridget Jones Diary" and Murray's other masterpiece "What About Bob?" 

But I digress.  Groundhog Day (the day, not the movie) speaks to our deepest yearnings for the coming of Spring in the depths of what is now a very frigid winter. And Groundhog Day (the movie, not the day) observes the mind-numbing monotony of everyday life coupled with the fantasy of excelling at a given endeavour if only given 365 chances to repeat it.  There is a lesson in there somewhere...I am just not sure what it is.

Here's to trying to get it right the first time...whatever "it" happens to be!

David M. Smith

David M. Smith - Click here for more information on David Smith.