More on Cy-Pres
John Darby died in 2008. In his July 2007 Will, he left his residence and contents to the “Heritage Society of Bedford” [Nova Scotia] on specific conditions. The conditions included a requirement that the Society commit to retain his property and contents as a heritage property; a commitment to use the building to house a museum or some other specified uses; to make such commitments within 1 year; and to open the residence for the stipulated purposes within 3 years. If they did not, the property was to fall into the residue.
However, at the time of his death (or at the time of the making of the Will, for that matter), there was no entity known as the “Heritage Society of Bedford”. There was a charity known as the “Bedford Heritage Society”. However, that charity disposed of its assets and surrendered its certificate of incorporation many years earlier.
The Fort Sackville Foundation claimed that it was the successor charity. The court rejected this claim, holding that there was no amalgamation. While the court will take a broad approach to legal successorship in such circumstances, it cannot find a successor where an entity ceased to exist.
The court went on to consider whether the doctrine of cy-pres applied. The doctrine will be applied where:
a. the gift as it stands is either impossible or impractical to effect; and
b. the donor expressed a general charitable intent in making the gift.
The court held that neither test had been met.
As to the first branch of the test, the gift was not impossible or impractical to effect. Because the gift provided for a gift-over, it could readily be given effect.
As to the second branch, the conditions of the gift narrowed the focus of the gift so as to take away a general charitable intent. The purpose of the gift was to preserve the deceased’s property. If that could not be done, the proceeds were to pass to the residual beneficiaries. Thus, it was held that there was no general charitable intent.
As a result, the proceeds of the sale passed to the residual beneficiaries.
See here for the reported decision.
Tomorrow, I will turn to the issue of costs.
Thank you for reading.
Paul E. Trudelle - Click here for more information on Paul Trudelle.
