World Cup Over: Spanish, Employers Rejoice

While returning to the office after a meeting Wednesday afternoon, I couldn't help but notice how many people were watching the Spanish defeat the Germans on the giant movie projectors set up in Toronto's underground labyrinth (for non-Torontonians: the major downtown subway stops, shopping centers and towers are connected by an underground network of tunnels and food courts).  The scene was replicated all along my journey.  What I did not see were the weeping business owners, but they must be out there.

According to this AP article, and this similar article, the World Cup will cost the German economy US$8 billion (0.27% GDP), Brazil shuts down, and as for Italy: when Italian FIAT autoworkers went on strike, by sheer coincidence the timing was 30 minutes before game time (did management even notice?); the issue was whether the workers could watch the game.  The World Cup is the fourth largest sapper of the US economy because of afternoon timing not popularity (March Madness NCAA basketball is tops).

Congrats to the Spanish champions.

Have a great and productive week,

Christopher M.B. Graham - Click here for more information on Chris Graham.

 

"Dead Weight" or "Dead Air" - not sure which play on words is more apt in this case...

The Sunday Times recently reported that two women were arrested for trying to push a dead relative strapped to a wheelchair onto a flight leaving out of Liverpool John Lennon Airport.  The charge - suspicion of failing to give notification of a death.

Police were apparently called when staff at the check-in desk became suspicious about the elderly man in the wheelchair. He was partially hidden behind sunglasses and did not appear to be moving.  While staff were told he was sleeping, it turns out he had been dead for some time.

It was reported that the ladies were likely attempting to evade the complex and costly process of repatriating human remains abroad - bodies being repatriated by air are required to be contained inside hermetically-sealed zinc-lined coffins and kept in the cargo hold for the duration of the journey. It is also necessary for the proper paperwork to be in place.

It is amazing the lengths these ladies went to to avoid abiding by the rules and regulations one has to adhere to before transporting human remains to a foreign country. Truly a bizarre tale!

Have a great weekend,

Natalia R. Angelini - Click here to learn more about Natalia Angelini.

The U.S. Death Tax is Dead! Will it be Resurrected?

The United State’s federal estate tax, more commonly known as the “Death Tax” is a tax applied to the transfer of a person’s assets at death. It is defined by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service as “a tax on your right to transfer property at your death.”

The Death Tax is paid by the recipients of an inheritance and is due within 9 months of the decedent’s death.   If there is not sufficient cash in the estate, personal property and business assets must be sold to pay the tax. 

As noted in one of our prior blogs, due to changes made by Congress during the George Bush administration back in 2001, the Death Tax was due to fall from 45% to 0% on January 1, 2010.  Many thought this loophole would be addressed before the start of the year. However, due to a Congressional tax standoff, no action was taken in time and the Death Tax has been repealed. However, the repeal is not permanent and the Death Tax is scheduled to be resurrected on January 1, 2010, at a rate of 55% on all assets above $1 million (the current exemption amount). 

It remains to be seen which way the political winds will blow, as Congress will likely address the issue this year. In the interim, estate planners in the U.S. are in uncharted territory, as no one can predict whether/when the Death Tax will be resurrected and if so, whether Congress will make it retroactive to the beginning of the year. This may ultimately be a matter for the courts to decide. Stay tuned!

Bianca La Neve

Bianca V. la Neve - Click here for more information on Bianca La Neve.

New Rules of Court for Ontario

 

As all litigators in the province of Ontario likely know by now, January 1, 2010 ushers in not only a new decade but New Rules of Civil Procedure. The New Rules apply to all matters, regardless of when they were commenced.

The amendments to the Rules effected by Ont. Reg. 438/08 are the most extensive and significant since the Rules were adopted in 1985. The fundamental goal of the reform is to make the civil justice system more affordable and accessible for Ontarians.

Some of the more significant changes are as follows:

Proportionality – In April of 2009 we saw a movement toward proportionality of time and expense with the interests at issue in estate litigation upon the introduction of the New Practice Direction for the Estates List of the Superior Court of Justice in Toronto. New Rule 1.04(1.1) brings this factor into play for litigation in all jurisdictions and mandates that Court Orders and Directions be proportionate to the importance and complexity of issues and amounts at stake.

Summary Judgment – Rule 20 expands the Court’s discretion to assess credibility, weigh evidence, conduct mini-trials with oral evidence, and award substantial indemnity costs against a party acting unreasonably or in bad faith.

Expert Evidence – Experts must provide fair objective and non-partisan opinion, give opinion evidence only on matters that are within their expertise, and assist the Court as reasonably required. This duty to the Court prevails over any obligation experts owe to the party who retained them. Expert reports must be filed 90 days before the pre-trial conference and responding expert reports must be served 60 days prior to the pre-trial conference.  

Discovery – Among the many changes regarding discovery is a new definition of relevance. The phrase “relating to any matter in issue in the action” has been replaced with “relevant to any matter in issue in the action”. This changes the test to one of simple relevance. Proportionality comes into play again in Rule 29.2, which sets out the considerations that must be made in determining questions to be answered or documents to be produced. Parties must agree to a written discovery plan (Rule 29.1) and there is a 7-hour time limit on oral examinations for discovery (R. 31.05.1).

Time – Calculation of time pursuant to Rule 3.01(1)(b) for notice periods of 7 days or less excludes holidays. There are also earlier deadlines for service and filing of materials for motions (Rule 37) Applications (Rule 38) and appeals from interlocutory orders (Rule 61).    

If your New Year’s resolution is to learn the New Rules and their impact on your estates practice, you should attend the OBA Trusts and Estates Section Seminar, "Stay on top of the New Rules of court" on January 6, 2010.

Program Chair, Jane Martin, and speakers,  Mr. Justice David M. Brown and Madam Justice Lois B. Roberts of the Superior Court of Justice, and Hull & Hull’s own Suzana Popovic-Montag, will guide you through the changes and provide an opportunity to ask questions regarding implications for estates practitioners.

For more on this topic see Gary Watson’s summary of the amendments and Marni Pernica’s recent article in OBA’s Deadbeat magazine.  Previous Hull & Hull commentary by Rick Bickhram and Paul Trudelle can be found here and here.

I suspect that following the New Rules is one Resolution you will be sure to keep!

Sharon Davis

Sharon Davis - Click here for more information about Sharon Davis.

 

Changes to British Columbia's Wills, Estates and Succession Legislation

British Columbia’s new Wills, Estates and Succession Act received Royal Assent on October 29, 2009. This new Act is a comprehensive statute designed to modernize and streamline the making of Wills and the administering of estates in British Columbia. 

Changes will include:

  • Introducing a simplified procedure for administering small estates;
  • Using the term “will-maker” instead of “testator”;
  • Incorporating succession law concepts currently found only in case law (such as those that apply to adopted children);
  • Granting the court the power to rectify a Will in certain situations, to ensure that a will-maker’s last wishes are respected; and
  • Abolishing the presumption that a gift given by the will-maker during his/her lifetime to a child is an advancement of a gift in the will – instead, such a gift would take effect according to its terms.

The new Act is expected to come into force sometime in 2011, which will allow time for the public and legal community to review and prepare for the new legislation. 

Wills made before the new Act comes into effect will not be invalidated, but the new Act will apply to the interpretation of existing Wills. This may lead to a flurry of demands to update existing Wills, so that a will-maker’s longstanding wishes are not inadvertently thwarted by the new statute.  More information can be found at www.ag.gov.bc.ca/justice-reform-initiatives.

Thanks for reading,

Bianca La Neve

Bianca V. La Neve - Click here for more information on Bianca La Neve.

Lexpert Zenith Awards

Last week Lexpert held the inaugural event for its Zenith Awards Celebrating Leading Women Lawyers. In a room sparkling with cool acrylic chairs and brilliant crystal chandeliers, brighter still shone the accomplishments of the 23 extraordinary women who were honoured for their outstanding achievement in the legal profession. Click here to see the list of recipients and to learn more about the Zenith Awards. 

Award winners were surrounded by the women and men who supported them throughout their careers and continue to do so. Navigation of the labyrinth takes dedication, smarts and resolve, true; but a little help can’t hurt every now and then. Support from peers is a gender neutral need that is undiminished by the passage of time or the accumulation of awards. In recognition of the necessary value of that support, at the heart of the Zenith Awards was the dedication of the recipients to mentoring. Honourees were paired with young women who, over the next year, will benefit tremendously from their mentor’s experience, support and network. 

Mentoring is not only a useful “nice-to-have” for Mentees; it is the fundamental component of excellence in the profession. We have a collective obligation to our peers and society to provide the guidance and support required to ensure we continue to flourish as a respected profession.

Many thanks to Lexpert, a Thomson Reuters Business, Editor-in-Chief extraordinaire Jean Cumming, and the incomparable Paula Todd, Emcee, for providing a spectacular evening of celebration.

 

A little motivation for a "Mentoring Monday" as you start your week!

Sharon Davis

Sharon Davis - Click here for more information on Sharon Davis.

Verdict in Astor Estate Criminal Case

The 85 year old son of New York socialite, Brooke Astor was convicted yesterday of grand larceny and scheming to fraud. For a background to the proceedings, click here and here.

After a 5 month trial and 12 days of jury deliberations, Anthony D. Marshall was found guilty of 14 charges, including giving himself a pay-rise of $1 million for managing his mother’s finances. He faces a mandatory sentence from 1 to 25 years behind bars. His sentencing is set for December 8, 2009.

The attorney who did the estate planning for Mrs. Astor was also convicted of forgery charges. Click here to read David Smith’s blog on the attorney’s actions.

The prosecution argued that Mrs. Astor’s Alzheimer’s was advanced so far that she could not understand the complex changes to her 2004 Will or other financial decisions that benefitted her son, such as the $1 million salary.

The defence has argued that Mrs. Astor had lucid moments despite her Alzheimer’s and that she gave her only son control of her estate out of love.

The story does not end there. Mr. Marshall may appeal and the question of what will happen to Mrs. Astor’s $180 million estate has not been resolved. A civil case was postponed pending the resolution of the criminal charges against Mr. Marshall. Some of the charitable beneficiaries of the estate sent observers to the criminal trial and it are not clear how evidence it the criminal  trial will impact the civil case.

Whichever Will is eventually probated, Mr. Marshall will receive a large portion of his late mother’s estate.

Happy Thanksgiving,

Diane Vieira

Diane  A. Vieira - Click here for more information on Diane Vieira.

Dying With Dignity

In a captivating article authored by Kent Sepkowitz, an infectious-disease specialist at a Cancer Center in New York City, he recounts the practical difficulties when someone dies at home - doing it yourself can be thorny and chaotic without the administrative help of Hospitals.

Specifically, when someone dies at home, a licensed professional must determine that the person is indeed dead.  While this should be arranged in advance with the doctor, the timing may not ultimately work out.  If no doctor is available, the other option is to call an ambulance…for a dead person.  There are reportedly other annoyances as well, including:

·                    the death certificate must be completed in black ink (using only certain approved diagnoses);

·                    an undertaker needs to be selected; and

·                    law enforcement must be called to establish that no foul play occurred – not an investigation anyone wants to deal with after just losing a loved one.

Mr. Sepkowitz notes that, with the active support of hospice care, savings could come from facilitating the wishes of those who choose to die at home.  He also considers what is likely the more important benefit of assuring tranquility and dignity for the person dying and their family.

Thanks for reading and have a great weekend!

Natalia Angelini

Natalia Angelini - Click here for more information on Natalia Angelini.

On the Big Screen: Challenging Dr. Barnes' Wishes

The Toronto International Film Festival brought stars to town and brought an estate issue into focus. The Art of the Steal  received accolades as a “thrilling whodunit” about the world-renowned Barnes art collection, valued in the “billions and billions.” Dr. Albert Barnes assembled art in the twenties and housed it in the suburb of Merion, Pennsylvania.

On his death in 1951, Dr. Barnes’ will gave control of the collection to the trustees of Lincoln University, the first black university in the United States. However, according to the film’s producer, in the nineties, a scheme was hatched to permanently remove the collection from Merion that some would later call the heist of the century.

The trustees’ decision to move the exhibit to downtown Philadelphia was met with legal challenges that did not succeed.  On a site called The Barnes Letters  it seems interest groups used the courts to deviate from Dr. Barnes’ express wishes to focus on “an educational organization designed to promulgate a unique way of teaching art appreciation.”

At an opening ceremony for the new site, protestors marked the occasion with signs advocating that Barnes’ “…Will Should Be Honoured.”

Art disputes relating to trusts and foundations are not uncommon. Here in Canada, one example involves a long-standing legal dispute between the U.K. Beaverbrook Foundation which claims that it only loaned art to a New Brunswick gallery – art that originally belonged to New Brunswick newspaper baron Max Aitken.  (See Paul Trudelle's September 14, 2009 blog).

These examples point to the idea that a testator’s expressed wishes for certain assets may not always be respected. Dr. Barnes wanted his art to stay put, while it was alleged that Lord Beaverbrook’s art was gifted to the people of New Brunswick.

Have a good Monday.

Jonathan Morse

Jonathan Morse - Click here for more information on Jonathan Morse.

Obviously Not Taking Advantage of the US "Cash for Clunkers" Program

Lonnie Holloway of Saluda, South Carolina was recently buried sitting upright in the front seat of his 1973 Pontiac Catalina.

According to the New York Times report (there is a video link, too), the 90 year old, described by a cousin as a “stylin’ and profilin’” man, had always said that he had wanted to be buried that way. He was also buried with his gun collection. He had said that he didn’t want them falling into the wrong hands.

The expressed wishes of the deceased raise a number of interesting issues to consider. Some immediate include:

  • Whether the directive regarding the means of burial is binding on the Estate Trustee. The rule is that directions contained in a deceased’s will are not binding on an executor. Additionally, an estate trustee is only allowed to recover reasonable burial expenses from the estate, taking into account the deceased’s position in life.
  • In Canada, there are restrictions that would intervene with respect to the disposal of weapons.
  • Will a Will that calls for the destruction of property be enforceable? In Wishart Estate (1992), 46 E.T.R. 311, the deceased left a will that called for the shooting of his four horses. The court found that the direction was void as being against public policy. In that case, the court referred to a Missouri Court of Appeals decision where a term in a will calling for the demolition of the deceased’s house was, similarly, found to be void as being in violation of public policy.

Have a great weekend. Keep your eyes on the road and your hands upon the wheel.

Paul Trudelle

Paul Trudelle - Click here for more information on Paul Trudelle.

Chai Tikvah Foundation

On Tuesday, I spoke to a wonderful group at the Chai Tikvah Foundation on the topic of estate planning and providing for a disabled beneficiary.

“Chai Tikvah” means “life” and “hope”. 

The Chai Tikvah Foundation provides housing, support and education to psychiatrically challenged adults in Jewish residential settings to enable them to lead more productive lives, and to help them integrate into the community. The Chai Tikvah Foundation operates a housing facility in North York, and offers additional support and education to the residents, non-residents, their families, and to the community.

Special estate planning concerns and considerations arise where individuals have family members who have special needs. It was a pleasure to address some of these issues with the group.

To the Chai Tikvah Foundation, thank you for having me and for the wonderful services that you provide. Keep up the good work!

Thank you for reading.

Paul Trudelle

Paul Trudelle - Click here for more information on Paul Trudelle.

Lord Beaverbrook's Legacy

A lengthy battle over ownership of 85 valuable works of art has ended recently, with a Canadian art gallery being allowed to keep the majority of the works.

As reported in the Toronto Star and the National Post, an appeal from a 2007 arbitrator’s decision (former Supreme Court of Canada Justice Peter Cory) was dismissed.

The UK based Beaverbrook Foundation had claimed that the paintings were on loan only, whereas Beaverbrook Art Gallery of Fredricton  claimed that the art was gifted by Lord Beaverbrook in the 1950s.   Paintings sent to the gallery before 1959 were found to be gifts, whereas 48 works sent after 1959 (about 10% of the value of the collection) were found to be loans, and are to be returned.

Thank you for reading.

Paul Trudelle
 

Paul Trudelle - Click here for more information on Paul Trudelle.

Leaving a Legacy

A good friend of mine recently reminded me that death is not just about dividing up the spoils (a common theme in estate litigation), but also about remembering the lasting contributions made by a person during their lifetime. I was reminded of this in reading about the recent deaths of two well-known figures, Donald Marshall and Eunice Kennedy Shriver.

Donald Marshall passed away last week in Sydney, Nova Scotia. In 1971, when he was just seventeen years old, Mr. Marshall was wrongfully convicted of a crime he did not commit and jailed for eleven years. He subsequently challenged the legal system and blazed a trail for other wrongfully convicted Canadians to fight to have their convictions overturned. His case led to a Royal Commission in 1990, which produced a slew of recommendations that fundamentally changed the criminal justice system in Nova Scotia. In 1993, Mr. Marshall again reluctantly stepped into the spotlight, when he was arrested and eventually convicted of various fishing violations. Mr. Marshall fought his convictions all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada, winning acquittals and a significant victory for the native treaty rights of his people, the Mi’kmaq Nation. 

This week, Eunice Kennedy Shriver (President John F. Kennedy's sister) passed away. Eunice Kennedy Shriver was a champion for the rights of the mentally disabled and founded the Special Olympics, which has grown into a truly global event. President Obama noted in a statement that Mrs. Shriver will be remembered as "as a champion for people with intellectual disabilities, and as an extraordinary woman who, as much as anyone, taught our nation — and our world — that no physical or mental barrier can restrain the power of the human spirit".

Thanks for reading,

Bianca La Neve

Bianca La Neve - Click here for more information on Bianca La Neve.

What's the Password?

Probably “123456”. No? Try “password”, or some variation of it.

Our heads are becoming jammed with passwords. Almost every website service we visit requires a password. 

A few diverse posts that I have come across have looked at password usage. 

In one study, which lists the 500 most popular passwords, reported here, the top 4 most common passwords are said to be “123456”, “password”, “12345678” and “1234”.

In another report, found here, Robert Graham writes about his analysis of the passwords of 20,000 users taken from a popular website and posted by a hacker.

He finds:

-16% of the passwords matched or were based on a person’s first name;

-14% were patterns on the keyboard, such as “123456” (I thought I was the only one to think of that) or “qwerty” or “1qaz2wsx” (check your keyboard);

-4% were variations of the word “password”, such as “passw0rd” or “password1”;

-4% referred to nearby items, such as the name brand on your computer or monitor;

-3% are swear words, or terms of endearment. The F-word is particularly popular;

-35% had 6 characters, 0.34% had 1 character, 1.14% had 10 characters.

See Robert Graham’s report for more detail, and check out the “Top 500” to see if your password makes the list.

As for estate practitioners, guessing their password is easy: 9 times out of 10 it is “intervivos1”.

Thanks for reading.

Paul Trudelle

Obituary TV

On February 26, 2009, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (“CRTC”) approved an application for a French-language specialty programming service that would be dedicated to the broadcast of obituary notices, notices of hospitalization and messages of thanks and prayers. The channel, called “Je me souviens”, will also air documentaries on the life of popular or important individuals.

According to a Montreal Gazette report, the station plans to go to air this summer. If it is successfully, the promoter plans to launch an English language channel for the rest of Canada.

The channel will be able to air national ads. The channel will also raise money by charging a fee, as yet undisclosed, for airing the obituaries.

Gerald Dominique, the promoter, says that his channel will give family and friends an opportunity to broadcast more information about their deceased loved ones: more than what can be published in a standard death notice. “My goal is that no death goes unnoticed.”

Thank you for reading.

Paul Trudelle

The Death of a Barrister

The British lawyer and author, John Mortimer, died on January 16, 2009. During his 85 years he produced more than 50 novels, biographies and memoirs. Of course he was best known for the creation of Rumpole of the Bailey.

Mr. Mortimer had an active professional life, and by many accounts, an active private life as well. He was first married in 1949: apparently he noticed his first wife while he rode a horse and peered over a hedge.  After divorcing around 1970, he married again in 1972.  Both wives were named Penelope, although he called his second wife Penny.

While the deceased lawyer may have organized his affairs with the requisite estate planning in place, the experience in Canada might suggest that Mr. Mortimer’s Estate will encounter some challenges not least of which may relate to copyright issues.

I refer to Lucy Maud Montgomery who died on April 24, 1942. The creator of Anne of Green Gables left a legacy of work and maybe just a few headaches for her heirs. 

After all the copyright kinks were ironed out, it seems that Anne of Green Gables has a bright future ahead of her.  With luck, and the combined efforts of lawyers and artists, Rumpole will experience similar success and longevity.

Thank you for reading.

Jonathan Morse

Dispute Over Mountie's Remains Comes to an End

The fight over the burial of a slain RCMP officer has finally come to an end. 

In May, and again in June, I blogged about the dispute over the remains of Leo Johnston, an RCMP officer who was slain along with three other officers in 2005.   

Following his death, Mr. Johnston was buried in his hometown in Alberta.  After his burial, his widow (who was also the executor of his estate) became aware of an RCMP policy allowing his remains to be buried in the RCMP cemetery in Saskatchewan.  She was granted a disinterment permit by the Director of Vital Statistics in Alberta allowing her to move the body; however, Mr. Johnston’s mother objected to the issuance of the permit. 

When the Director declined to rescind the permit, the mother applied to the court for judicial review.  When that was unsuccessful, she appealed to the Court of Appeal; the appeal was dismissed

The mother then sought leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada; however, leave was denied in November of this past year.

At the time, the widow said she was going to wait a little bit to move the body in order to give Mr. Johnston’s mother time to come to terms with the news.  Now comes word that at the beginning of January the body was disinterred and moved to Saskatchewan. 

Incidentally, the criminal proceedings surrounding the death of Mr. Johnston and the other three officers appears to be coming to a close.  On Monday, the two men charged in the killings pleaded guilty to manslaughter. 

Thanks for reading,

Megan F. Connolly  

Looking Forward to 2009

I hope everyone is having great holiday season.

With the close of 2008, we turn and look to the promise of 2009. In looking ahead to 2009 many may wonder if they have properly protected and provided for those they intend to protect should something unexpected happen to them. Questions may also arise regarding whether a spouse or parent has taken steps to provide for themselves and/or those they intend to provide for.

 

While there are no doubt many things to consider for the new year from a family perspective, perhaps this is the year to resolve to consider, or reconsider, whether your family’s legal affairs have been properly planned.

 

I wish everyone a healthy, happy and prosperous 2009.

 

Happy New Year! Craig

 

Step 3: "On Second Thought..." - Codicils

A quick aside before I consider the effect of making changes to your Will (referred to as a Codicil) or altering your Will, which is Step 3 of my estate planning discussion.  Cable magnate Ted Rogers has passed away at the age of 75 (watch a video link here).  He built his company, Rogers Communications, from one FM radio station into Canada's largest wireless, cable and media company.  I stumbled across an amusing anecdote from his early days as a boarding student at Toronto's Upper Canada College - ostensibly he defied his school rules by rigging up an antenna in his dorm room to present TV shows and charging admission.  From this early start he became a true pioneer of the Canadian communications industry and a prolific philanthropist.  We extend our sympathies to his family, friends, and employees at this sad time.

Today I will briefly consider codicils - a document used to amend a Will's original text.  Ideally the use of codicils should try and be avoided, as current technology should permit making the necessary changes on a computer and simply re-printing the Will.  This also has the advantage of not making it obvious to the beneficiaries (whose gift is being depleted or removed), and also avoids the possibility of transcription errors.  However, in certain cases a formal codicil or even a holograph codicil (i.e. a very ill client) may be advisable.

In any event, avoid making changes to your Will without legal input as doing so may lead to family discord down the road if the proper formalities are not observed.  Alterations on the face of your Will should be avoided (see Paul Trudelle's blog on this issue here)  - as such alterations typically require an application for the opinion, advice and direction of the Court. 

Sarah Hyndman Fitzpatrick

 

  

Trust Law and Zebra Mussels

In the wee hours of Saturday night, on my umpteenth flight back from Asia this year, I couldn't help but ponder two things.  First, the recent collapse of the U.S./global financial system and greater economy compares poorly to what I have witnessed in Asia for years now.  But we still have the relative advantage of trust law to keep us prosperous, right?  Perhaps, but so does everyone else, or they're trying to develop it.  At least in theory, just about every major Asian jurisdiction purports to have some legal structure supporting the creation, operation and regulation of trusts.

Australian trust law is unsurprisingly advanced, being a fully English-speaking (sort of, anyway) Common Law jurisdiction.  The great former British colony and global trading port of Hong Kong boasts a highly-developed trust law framework based on the Common Law.   This legal system has been wisely preserved by the PRC, and is in the process of a major overhaul.  Mainland China itself has recognized the utility of trusts and passed its first trust statute.  Another former British colony, Singapore, sports a highly-developed trust law with a judiciary that pragmatically relies on Common Law developments from all jurisdictions to keep with the times.  Japan is characteristically inscrutable, but apparently recently revised its trust legislation.

Of course, it is probably incorrect to equate the mere presence of a legal structure with its widespread use.  Nevertheless, trust law is spreading, at least superficially, faster than zebra mussels.

The second thought in my mind was that a 14-hour flight, followed by 5 days of jet-lagged, dazed "vacation" on 12-hour time change, followed by a return flight just as jet lag from the away flight has worn off, followed by more jet lag from a 12-hour reverse, is not something that will be repeated any time soon.

Thanks,

Chris

 

 

 

 

 

Charles Dubin - The passing of a Legal Legend

It was with considerable sadness that the legal community marked the passing of Charles Dubin last week. In its obituary, The Toronto Star called him "a legal giant" and a "national icon" and it was not alone. Charles Dubin was widely acknowledged as possessing a keen legal mind. He was also a superlative lawyer and an outstanding judge. He was a “man of the law”.

Charles Dubin was from a different era where great advocates seemed to tower over the profession (there were also a lot less lawyers and it was most definitely a closed shop). As with many of his generation, he represented both civil and criminal clients. Charles Dubin represented prime ministers and football players, bookies and major corporations. He was counsel to The Toronto Telegram and represented The Toronto Firefighters as well as Ontario Hydro's employees. He also defended 15 capital murder trials before capital punishment was abolished (a daunting brief). 

Charles Dubin was called to the Bar in 1944. In 1973, he was appointed to the Ontario Court of Appeal. In 1983, he released a report on improving procedures at The Hospital for Sick Children after nurse Susan Nelles was cleared of killing four babies. He is perhaps most famous for his inquiry into the use of drugs in Canadian amateur sport following the disgrace of Ben Johnson at the Olympic Games in Seoul. In 1990, he became the Chief Justice of Ontario. He retired in 1996 and returned to private practice – a true champion of the law to the very end.

Charles Dubin will be missed by the profession.

Justin

TIME TO GIVE THANKS

As it is the Friday before a long weekend, I thought a more light-hearted blog would be in order. 

What is the origin of Canadian Thanksgiving? Like so much in Canada, we borrowed the tradition from our American cousins in the mid 1800s. However, at the time, Protestant church leaders in Ontario wanted to set the right moralistic tone when it came giving thanks for the harvest. As such, Thanksgiving started off as a decidedly religious, white Anglo-Saxon Protestant, pro-British and anti-American affair. Catholics were certainly not welcome nor were visible or religious minorities. The first national Thanksgiving was held in 1859 on a Thursday. Over time, the Protestant churches lost control of the holiday and it became more secular and less exclusive. Parliament eventually declared that Thanksgiving should fall on the second Monday of October partly due to pressure from transport companies who hoped that a holiday on a Monday would increase holiday traffic. 

Canadian Thanksgiving therefore had nothing to do with harvesting of crops or the arrival of fall colours. But Canadian Thanksgiving is nevertheless typically Canadian: it sprang from a parochial and prejudiced mindset heavily influenced by the politics and values of the day not to mention the colossus to the south. The world of commerce also had a say and got its way when it came to a fixed date. However, as Canada grew and matured as a country, Thanksgiving become more widespread and inclusive. Today, Thanksgiving is a time for all Canadians to give thanks for the bounty of the land and the freedoms we enjoy.  Vive le Canada and Happy Thanksgiving!!

Thanks for reading my blogs this week. 

Justin

Prosper and Live Long

Comparisons of life expectancy across different regions of Canada suggest that Southern, Urban dwellers in mid-size cities tend to live the longest. Northern groups, particularly those with large aboriginal segments, tend to face a much grimmer situation, according to this 2000 article,living approximately 4 years less on average.

Some encouraging news is that the country’s average life expectancy continues to rise. Of particular interest to me: men are approaching women in terms of life expectancy, although we’re not quite there yet. As against the rest of the world, Canada just barely cracks the top ten according to Wikipedia with an average life expectancy of 80.34, trailing number 1 Andorra’s (Andorra - who knew?) average lifespan of 83.52 years.  Swazilanders, with an average lifespan of 39.6 years, have the terrible distinction of being at the bottom of the list.

Women apparently live longer than men in every region except South Asia.

As would be expected, there seems to be an obvious and very strong correlation between level of industrialization and overall wealth and longer lifespan.

Are you feeling optimistic? Try this Life Expectancy Test to get a sense of the factors affecting you.

Thanks for reading.

Sean Graham

Sharia and the Common Law

The UK, home of the Common Law, seems willing to experiment with alternatives under certain conditions. Elements of Sharia law are apparently making inroads into some areas, most notably family law and estate law.

In early 2008, the Archbishop of the Church of England suggested that the incorporation of elements of Islamic law into the English polity was unavoidable, causing quite a stir before being echoed by a top judge. For a sense of the extent of the debate this has caused in the UK, see this website.

The possible application of Sharia law and other forms of law in the same country has been in the news with respect to any number of countries, including the US, Nigeria, and Australia.

Here’s an interesting article from Australia suggesting that concerns about Sharia law in that country could be overblown. Also, see here for a reversal of the pattern of Common Law countries debating whether to incorporate Sharia, showing that change is not necessarily a one-way street.

Canada is not left out of the debate, with the possible incorporation of Sharia law into some legal relations having been recently ruled out by Quebec and Ontario, the two largest provinces.

It ought to be fascinating to see how things develop in the coming years.

Thanks for reading.

Sean Graham

 

Stop the news, I want to get off!

Boy, does August ever seem sleepy and restful in retrospect. After a summer in which the Beijing Olympics was probably the major story, the first two weeks of September have served to snap Canadians and Americans out of their reverie. Consider the following developments, all crammed into just over three weeks:

- The US Democratic Convention, featuring the first African-American candidate on any US presidential ticket (and by my hasty reckoning the first black candidate with a strong chance to win executive office anywhere in the entire Western World), takes place from August 25 to August 28;

- The US Republican Convention, featuring the first female candidate on a Republican ticket, and only the second in history, takes place from September 1 to 4;

- Canadian Federal Election commences;

- Hurricane Ike hits Texas; and

- Financial turmoil hits the markets.

And that’s just North America. All this as kids go back to school and summer vacations become a thing of the past. What’s a politico-newsophile like yours truly to do? There’s just not enough hours in the day to keep up with everything.

At least by the end of the first week in November, both elections will be history, hurricane season should be over and hopefully some calm will have returned in the markets. Just in time for the holiday rush. Oh well, there’s always next summer.

Thanks for reading.

Sean Graham

Son Wants Nazi Father Declared Dead

The son of the notorious Nazi criminal Aribert Heim wants his father declared dead so that he and his siblings can manage his father’s assets. Aribert Heim fled Germany in 1962 when a warrant was issued for his arrest. The Simon Wiesenthal Centre has been tracking him since that time but has never captured him.

In 1997, the son and his sister discovered a German bank account in their father’s name containing 1.78 million dollars. The German government froze the bank account. The son says that if his father is declared dead and he inherits money from his father, he will donate it to the study of the Mauthausen concentration camp.

His son insists that he has not see his father since 1962 and has had no contact with him since that time with the exception of receiving two unsigned notes in 1962 and 1967. His father would turn 94 this year and he assumes that he is likely dead. However, throughout the last four decades Aribert Heim has been spotted numerous times and as late as last month; the Simon Wiesenthal Centre believed that they have found evidence of him living in Chile.  The son says that he is working with a lawyer to provide evidence of his father’s death.

In Canada, the court is authorized by the Declarations of Death Act to determine whether a person is dead on the basis of circumstantial evidence or the rule of common law which presumes a person dead after an unexplained absence of seven years or more. Click here to listen to a podcast on the Declaration of Death Act and the Absentee Act. Additionally, under the Rules of Civil Procedure, an interested party can also apply for the opinion, advice, and direction of the court.

Thanks for reading,
 

Diane Vieira

The Olympics from a Legal Perspective

 The Beijing Olympic Games come to a close this weekend and the international sports community turns their attention to the 2010 Vancouver Games and the 2012 London Games.
 
The Olympics inspire a multitude of feelings and generate a healthy amount of debate. One thing for certain is that a tremendous amount of preparation is required by the hosting city and the effort of a variety of people are required to pull it all together.
 
An interesting article posted on timesonline looks at the impact of the Olympic Games on the legal profession. The article boldly declares that lawyers are as much a part of the sporting community as athletes. It goes on to describe how the Olympics generate a boom in legal work as a result of preventing ambush marketing and unauthorized broadcasts as well as both defending and prosecuting anti-doping cases.
 
For those interested in learning more about international sports law, a great international law blog Opinio Juris featured some excellent expert commentators during the Beijing Games. A compelling post discussed the growing prominence of athletes representing countries that they are not citizens of. The author contrasts a competitor’s identity vs. a national identity and explains the requirements under the Olympics Charter for an athlete to compete for a nation.
 
Congratulations to all the athletes and let's get ready for 2010!
 
Enjoy your weekend,

Diane Vieira

Day Eleven of the Olympics and Counting

Today, if I have my count right, is day eleven of the Olympics. For certain, the Olympics stimulate debate on a spectrum of important social, political, economic and, of course, athletic issues of our time. I do not intend to touch upon those debates. Over the past ten days of the Olympics, however, incredible stories of the athletes have arisen, and will no doubt continue to arise. Some, like Michael Phelps’ eight gold medals, involve incredible success, almost beyond one’s imagination, while others involve success on a more personal level or, as the saying goes, the agony of defeat. These stories, from whatever viewpoint, are quite remarkable and have no doubt involved the setting of objectives, planning and dedication and commitment to the goal.

While perhaps obvious, it continues to strike me as to the extent that these athletes live in the moment or for the day. So much rises and falls for them with one or in some cases several performances. What onlookers of the Olympics take away from the Olympics is no doubt personal but perhaps the notion of setting objectives, striving to obtain them while living for the day is the most universal.

What do these stories actually have to do with Estates? From a legal standpoint, nothing. However, perhaps the above notion may focus us to consider our own legacy and the steps that have been taken, or should be taken now, to ensure that those that benefit from that legacy are the intended ones.

Keep watching.

Craig
 

The Horror: Sean Connery's Son Required to Get a Job

Imagine that one day, you were told you had to get a job.  You were told to go make a living, and that hard work was good.  Not only that, you would have to work FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE. 

According to virtually every news source in the British Isles, that's exactly what Sir Sean Connery is being accused of doing to his only son, Jason.  This shocking revelation appears to have been exposed by a former wife of the former 007 star, Diane Cilento.  The root cause may be Sean Connery's experience with really, really hard work reportedly as a barrow-pusher in Edinburgh's industrial sector (back when Edinburgh had an industrial sector), as a milkman, and other tough jobs prior to superstardom.  Sean Connery reportedly wanted Jason to develop a work ethic. 

Sean Connery's fortune is estimated at 85,000,000 pounds - about USD$170,000,000 - and his son Jason allegedly won't see any of it, according to Cilento, because Sean Connery has left him out of his Will.  Apparently, after a tough go of it in the 1980's, Jason works and even earns a successful living as an actor and film director in his own right. 

Perhaps the most interesting thing about this story is that a hugely wealthy and successful father forcing his son to get a job is a newsworthy story.         

Have a great day at work,

Chris Graham

 

 

A Bronx Story: $20 million lost by public administrators

Speaking of risky U.S. investments...

Public administrators of estate monies appear to have lost around $20,000,000.  The place?  The Bronx, NY.  When a New York resident dies intestate (without a will), his or her assets are managed by these public administrators until there is a court-approved settlement.  This is roughly the equivalent of monies paid into Court in Ontario.  The investments are even overseen by a judge.  

Similar to Ontario, the monies ought to be invested in low-risk investments like Treasury bills.  But apparently that principle was ignored by the public administrators, who instead bought auction-rate securities, the market for which collapsed in February.   

The lesson?  First, nothing happens on a small scale in New York, not even in the Bronx.  Second, a "risky" investment means that one might lose money.  A tough concept to grasp?  Third, someone else always gets paid: see page 2 of the article.  Where there are investments to be made, there are fees to be paid. 

Luckily for the beneficiaries, it appears that ultimately the city (ie, the taxpayers) will pay, not the various estates' beneficiaries. 

Thanks for reading,

Chris Graham

Blackberries: Hazardous to your Health?

Blackberries and iPhones have been in the news a lot lately. These communication devices seem to have become irreplaceable for many Canadians and their frequent use is having an impact on the work place.

 

This past Monday, the Globe & Mail carried a story about the potential health impacts of the chronic use of these devices. Problems such as Blackberry Belly, caused by slouching when you hunch over to read your screen, and Blackberry Thumb, caused from excessive texting, were just two of the many afflictions cited by a physiotherapist and researchers quoted in the article. Aside from these physical ailments, frequent Blackberry use may also contribute to anxiety.

 

The use of Blackberries after regular work hours also has the potential of becoming a pertinent employment issue with employees seeking compensation for their use outside office hours. Late last month, the Globe & Mail carried a story about the writers’ union for ABC News, the Writers Guild of America. The Guild was challenging a long standing contract waiver that prevented employees from collecting overtime pay for work that was be done after work hours and facilitated via communication devices such as Blackberries.

 

It will be interesting to see if the changing technology will have a long term impact on employee’s work environments, or if this is much ado about nothing.

 

Have a nice day,

Diane Vieira

GOLF AND ESTATES

Looking out of our office window on such a beautiful summer day, my mind drifted from blogging to golfing. I then struggled to make a connection between the world of trusts and estates, and thoughts of golfing.

The one thing that immediately came to mind was the comment of Rodney Dangerfield’s character Al Czervic from the movie “Caddyshack” that “Golf courses and cemeteries are the biggest waste of prime real estate in America.”

Looking a little deeper on the internet, I found a wealth of golf-related murder mysteries!  Yahoo hosts a group for golf mystery collectors. The Waterboro Public Library has compiled a list of well over 100 golf murder mysteries (I stopped counting at 100). 

Titles include “Death is a Two-Stroke Penalty”, “Deadly Divots”, “Death Under Par”, “Rotten Lies”, “Fairway to Heaven”, “Putt to Death”, “Par for the Corpse” and “Six Strokes Under”. There appears to be no limit to the punning.

Whether you’re reading, or golfing, or both, have a great summer!

Thank you for reading.

Paul Trudelle

Will the Great Wealth Transfer Be Not So Great?

Estate practitioners are fond of discussing the “unprecedented transfer of wealth” that is set to occur over the next few decades.  The idea is that as the asset-rich baby boomers age and pass away, the number of estates being distributed (and the size of the estates) will be at a level never before seen. 

However, as an interesting article in the New York Times points out, people expecting a windfall when mom or dad die might be in for a surprise.  In his article, 8 Reasons You Should Not Expect an Inheritance, Ron Leiber points out that while the aging population might be wealthier than in generations past, people are also living longer and have higher expenses. 

Some of the issues that Mr. Leiber raises in his articles are more relevant to U.S. residents, but most have more general application; here are some of them:

1.       People are living longer.  In 2005, the life expectancy more males who reached the age of 65 was 82 while for females it was 87;

2.      Work-place pensions are becoming less common, meaning that people are more reliant on the financial markets (and their ups and downs) to generate retirement savings;

3.       The skyrocketing costs of health care will increasingly be passed to the consumer; and

4.       Divorce is on the rise, meaning that the aging retirees might be sole income, not dual income, and, thus, have greater expenses (and less wealth to pass on).

While the fact remains that the aging boomers have greater wealth than ever before, it’s worthwhile for those engaged in both planning and litigation to keep in mind the outside forces that will affect the size of an estate.

Have a great weekend,

Megan F. Connolly

Is a Billionaire's Estate Going to the Dogs?

Leona Helmsley, the deceased billionaire hotelier who, in her will, left her dog Trouble a $12 million trust, is back in the news.  

Also in her will, Ms. Helmsley directed that the bulk of her estate (estimated to be worth somewhere between $5 billion - $8 billion) be put into a charitable trust.  However, until now little has been revealed about who the beneficiaries of the trust were.  

As it turns out, she attached to her will a memorandum containing a “mission statement” setting out she wished the funds left to the charitable trust to be distributed.  In it, she specified that she wanted the funds to be used for the care and welfare of dogs (in an earlier version of the memorandum she had directed that the poor and indigent also be beneficiaries of the trust but apparently later changed her mind and decided that the funds should just be used to the benefit of dogs.)  

People who have seen the memorandum have questioned whether it would have much legal effect. Apparently, the estate trustees are provided with some discretion as to whom the funds should be distributed.  In addition, the memorandum is drafted as an expression of wishes rather than as a testamentary document.  Nevertheless, it does speak to what the testator’s intent is and, as such, likely cannot be completely ignored.  

In any event, Ms. Helmsley’s estate trustees have tried to avoid publicizing the exact contents of the memorandum.  They might have reason to be concerned – after the $12 million trust left to Trouble was revealed, the poor dog received death threats!

Thanks for reading,

Megan F. Connolly

 

 

Métis Group Weighs in on Burial Dispute

In May, I wrote a blog about a battle between the wife of a dead RCMP officer and his mother over the burial place of his remains.  The wife learned about a policy allowing an officer to be buried in the RCMP national cemetery and applied to the Director of Vital Statistics for permission to move the deceased’s body from its current place of burial (near his hometown) to the RCMP national cemetery in Saskatchewan.

The deceased’s mother objected to this and litigation ensued.  In May, the Alberta Court of Appeal held that the wife could indeed move the body if she chose.  The deceased’s mother has since indicated she intends to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Last week, CBC News reported that the Métis National Council has now become involved (the deceased was of Métis descent). 

In an open letter to the deceased’s wife appearing in newspapers in Calgary and Regina, the president of the council implored to her not to move the body, writing “I hope you will reconsider your decision to have your husband disinterred and taken away from his people and his family…His resting place is a place of honour, an enduring testament to his selfless sacrifice and an eternal memorial to his cherished place in the hearts of his family and the Métis Nation."

It is not clear whether an application seeking leave to appeal the decision has been made yet and, if it is, whether it will be granted.  If this case does end up before the Supreme Court I would not be surprised to see the Métis National Council seek leave to intervene.

Have a great day!

Megan F. Connolly

Summer Days

Ah, summer is upon us, and not a moment too soon. After what seemed like the longest Spring I can remember, we finally had our first genuine summer weekend.

School’s one week from being OVER, and kids are so eager they can taste the two full months of freedom headed their way.  Camps, holidays, lazy weekends at the lake beckon.

With the European Soccer (sorry, Futbol) Championships in full force, Wimbledon and the US Open in tennis and the Beijing Olympics slated for later, not a bad time to be a sports fan either.

So, here’s to a great summer all around, for kids, families, and yes, even the lawyers.  Enjoy.

And never fear, things will get plenty serious in the fall, with Canadian and US elections either certain or very likely indeed.

Thanks for reading.

Sean Graham

OBA Trusts and Estates Section Year End Dinner

The Ontario Bar Association (OBA), Trusts and Estates Section, year end dinner was held on May 27, 2007 at the Gardiner Museum in Toronto. 

Jordan Atin, the Chair of the Section for the past year, brought the past year to a close and the election of the OBA, Trusts and Estates Section Executive for the 2007/2008 year, was confirmed. 

The Section also paid tribute to this year’s recipient of the Award for Excellence in Trusts and Estates, Barry Corbin.

The Award for Excellence was created to recognize exceptional contributions and achievements by members of the OBA to the area of trusts and estates. The criteria for the award is demonstrated leadership in the trusts and estates bar through knowledge, experience, skill, commitment, passion and strength of character, plus all or some of the following:

·         academic excellence through teaching at the Bar Admission Course, lecturing at a law school, participating in Continuing Legal Education and/or academic writing;

·         participation in the OBA Trusts and Estates Section Executive or the Law Society of Upper Canada on wills, trusts and estate matters; and

·         contribution to the development of wills, trusts and estate law.

In addition to the Award for Excellence, Archie Rabinowitz was presented with the Widdifield Award and Corina Weigl with the Hoffstein Book Prize.

Congrats to Barry, Archie and Corina.  The venue, dinner (and particularly the Cornish Hen) and evening were all quite enjoyable.

 

Thanks for reading.

 

Craig

Law Society Establishes New Client Identification and Verification Requirements

Recently, convocation at the Law Society of Upper Canada approved an amendment to By-Law 7.1 [Operational Obligations and Responsibilities] that has the effect of establishing stricter guidelines with respect to client identification and verification. 

 

A copy of the notice to the legal profession describing the changes can be found here and applies to both lawyers and paralegals.   

 

Under the amendment, which is effective October 31, 2008, a lawyer who is retained must obtain certain information from the client, including name, address, telephone number, and occupation.  If the client is an organization, the information the lawyer must obtain includes the client’s business identification number, general type of business, place of incorporation, and identity of the organization’s instructing officers.

 

Where a lawyer receives, pays, or transfers funds on behalf of a client, certain verification rules will be triggered.  Specifically, the lawyer must take “reasonable steps” to verify the client’s identity by obtaining independent documentation, such as a driver’s license, passport or birth certificate (or, in the case of an organization, a partnership agreement or articles of incorporation. 

 

For most practitioners, this amendment likely codifies what they already do.  In any event, it’s worthwhile to have a look and make sure that your practice policies conform to the guidelines in the new amendment.

 

Have a great day!

Megan F. Connolly

Reminder About our June 4 Breakfast Seminar!

Just a reminder that our next breakfast series seminar is being held on June 4, 2008.  It is being held at the Ontario Bar Association at 20 Toronto Street. 

There will be presentations on the following topics:

The breakfast seminars are always fun and informative and I would definitely encourage you to attend.  If you haven’t already signed up and would like to, please contact Diane Labao, who can be reached at 416.369.1516 or dlabao@hullandhull.com.  If you have signed up already, we look forward to seeing you there.  

If you are interested in obtaining copies of papers that have previously been presented, they are available here.  In addition, we also offer audio CDs of our presentations. 

Have a great day,

Megan F. Connolly