To What Extent Must an Attorney Keep Accounts?

The recent decision in McAllister Estate v. Hudgin provides a helpful review of the nature of a trustee’s duty to account.

In McAllister, the Deceased named her daughter as her estate trustee and divided the residue of her estate between her daughter and her son.  The daughter had acted as the Deceased’s attorney for property in the four years prior to the Deceased’s death. 

After the Deceased’s death, the son sought an order compelling the daughter to pass accounts for her actions as attorney. 

The daughter argued that the son was not entitled to an accounting because (1) he had no standing to request it (although she did not seriously pursue this ground) and (2) she was not required to keep accounts because when she was acting as attorney her mother was capable. 

Pattillo J. found that as the mother had been capable, the attorney had no duty under s. 42 of the Substitute Decisions Act to keep accounts, although the court retained the discretion to order an attorney to pass accounts for all or part of the period in which she acted. 

In making this determination, the court considered two main issues: (1) the extent of the attorney’s involvement in the grantor’s affairs; and (2) whether the applicant seeking to compel an accounting has raised significant concerns about the attorney’s management of the grantor’s affairs. 

Ultimately, the court decided that both criteria had been met.  However, the court stopped short of requiring the daughter to produce formal accounts, deciding that the production of bank statements and investment records was sufficient.   

Have a great day,

Megan F. Connolly

Real Estate Transactions Involving Powers of Attorney

In order to attempt to combat what is felt to be a growing problem of real estate fraud, the Ontario government has put new registration requirements in place when a real estate document is being registered.

The requirements call for the making of certain “law statements” by an individual registering a real estate document (transfer or mortgage) under the authority of a power of attorney. The individual must make a statement that they are acting within the scope of the power of attorney. Further, the solicitor must discuss the power of attorney with the client and make a “law statement”. For most purposes, the solicitor must complete the following statement:

I, name of solicitor, confirm that I have reviewed the power of attorney with the attorney, and the attorney has confirmed that:

1. The attorney is the lawful party named in the power of attorney,

2. The attorney is acting within the scope of the authority granted under the power of attorney,

3. To the best of the attorney’s knowledge, information and belief, the power of attorney was lawfully given, and

4. The power of attorney has not been revoked.

In addition, the original signed and witnessed power of attorney must be scanned and registered. 

Lawyer and bencher Robert Aaron discussed the new requirements in a recent article in the Law Times, p. 12. Mr. Aaron stated that while the new requirements will allow the party on the other side of the transaction (and their solicitor) to review the power of attorney document, and provides an opportunity for defective powers of attorney to be caught, “I’m not sure that it will frankly do much to stop fraudulent powers of attorney.”

Thank you for reading.

Paul Trudelle

Dealing with Estate Planning - Hull on Estates and Succession Planning Podcast #116

Listen to Dealing with Estate Planning

This week on Hull on Estate and Succession Planning, Ian and Suzana discuss dealing with estate planning and encouraging everyone to draw up a will.

Comments? Send us an email at hullandhull@gmail.com, call us on the comment line at 206-457-1985, or leave us a comment on the Hull on Estate and Succession Planning blog. Continue Reading...

Accounting Under the Powers of Attorney - Hull on Estates #113

Listen to Accounting Under the Powers of Attorney

This week on Hull on Estates, Diane and Paul discuss accounting under the powers or attorney, the duty to account after the guarantor has passed away and the De Zorzi Estate v. Read case (2008, O.J. No. 944).

Comments? Send us an email at hull.lawyers@gmail.com, call us on the comment line at 206-350-6636, or leave us a comment on the Hull on Estates blog. Continue Reading...

To Whom Does an Attorney Have a Duty to Account?

An interesting decision was recently released relating to an attorney’s obligation to account to people other than the estate trustee of a (deceased) grantor’s estate. 

In Guerin v. Read, the deceased died in December 2004.  The residual beneficiaries of her estate sought an order requiring the estate trustee to provide disclosure of the deceased’s financial documents from January 2004 to the deceased’s death or, in the alternative, that the estate trustee pass accounts for the period in which she acted as the deceased’s attorney for property; that is, September 2004 to the deceased’s death. 

It is worthwhile mentioning that all parties agreed that the deceased had been mentally competent up to her death. 

The estate trustee opposed disclosing the records for the period prior to the deceased’s death, arguing that, with respect to her actions as attorney, the only person to whom she had an obligation to account was the grantor (who had since died).

In Justice Herman’s decision, she referred to the complicating fact that, in this case, the deceased’s estate trustee and her attorney for property were one and the same.  As such, a true accounting could not occur as between the attorney and the estate trustee.  Justice Herman found s. 42(4) of the Substitute Decisions Act, which provides that “any other person, with leave of the court” could bring an application to compel an attorney to pass accounts, could, in appropriate circumstances, include the beneficiaries of an estate.

As such, she concluded the attorney could be required to account to someone other than the estate trustee and that disclosure in the manner sought by the beneficiaries was an essential part of this obligation.

Have a great day!

Megan F. Connolly