<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>applications - Toronto Estate Law Blog</title>
<link>http://estatelaw.hullandhull.com/articles/topics/estate-trust/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:14:27 -0500</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>The Decision of Justice Brown - Hull on Estates #165</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>
<p>Listen to <a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/kirsten/HOE_165.mp3">The Decision of Justice Brown</a></p>
<p>This week on Hull on Estates, Ian Hull and Suzana Popovic-Montag discuss<span style="font-size: 10pt;">&nbsp;the recent decision of&nbsp;<em><span style=""><a href="http://http/www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2009/2009canlii25140/2009canlii25140.html">Re Pearsall&nbsp;</a></span></em>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">In this decision, Justice Brown offers clarification on the issue of where applications involving estates may be commenced. </span><br />
<br />
Paul Trudelle has&nbsp;<span style="font-size: 10pt;">&nbsp;previously&nbsp;</span>written a <span style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><a href="../../../../2009/05/articles/topics/passing-of-accounts-6/venue-for-passing-of-accounts-applications/">post about the decision</a></span>.</p>
</p>
<p>If you have any comments, send us an email at <a href="mailto:hull.lawyers@gmail.com">hull.lawyers@gmail.com</a> or leave a comment on our&nbsp;<a href="../../../../">blog</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://estatelaw.hullandhull.com/2009/06/articles/podcasts-audio/the-decision-of-justice-brown-hull-on-estates-165/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estatelaw.hullandhull.com/2009/06/articles/podcasts-audio/the-decision-of-justice-brown-hull-on-estates-165/</guid>
<category> PODCASTS / AUDIO</category><category>Hull on Estates</category><category>Pearsall</category><category>Show notes</category><category>Suzana Popovic-Montag</category><category>applications</category><category>ian hull</category><category>jurisdiction</category><category>justice brown</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Hull and Hull LLP</dc:creator>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/kirsten/HOE_165.mp3" length="10222071" type="audio/mpeg" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Multiple Wills Can Mean Multiple Certificates of Appointment</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Primary and secondary wills are common enough situations for estates practitioners: one will for probate and the other for assets that can pass outside probate, to minimize estates administration taxes.&nbsp; But what about situations with multiple wills requiring probate?</p>
<p>According to the October 8, 2008 endorsement of Mr. Justice Brown (court file no. 01-2725-08, no link available yet), where a testator makes 2 wills, each covering different assets, and each naming different executors, a local estates registrar can issue separate Certificates of Appointment of Estate Trustees to different executors limited to the assets referred to in each Will.</p>
<p>The endorsement closes with 2 &quot;reminders&quot;&nbsp;to applicants in multiple wills situations (I won't paraphrase):...</p>]]><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt">First &quot;reminder&quot;:</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;<span style="font-size: 10pt">&quot;If multiple wills exist and the executors plan to obtain probate for each, in addition to including an affidavit attesting to non-revocation as I described above, the applicants should ensure that the draft limited assets certificates of appointment which they submit each clearly identify the will for which probate is sought - e.g. the General Will dated X, or the Secondary Will dated Y, or the &quot;will dated Z styled as the Limited Assets Will&quot;.&nbsp; With each will clearly identified on the face of each certificate, the risk of any confusion arising from the issuance of separate certificates for each will should be kept to a minimum.&quot;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt">Second &quot;reminder&quot;:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt">&quot;If the application for a certificate involves a <em>Granovsky</em>-type situation where probate is sought only for one of the wills, it is important that the application materials contain a brief affidavit attesting that the non-probated will does not contain any provision revoking the will for which probate is being sought.&nbsp; Such evidence will permit the Estates Office to be satisfied that the will for which probate is sought&nbsp;remains in force and governs the disposition of the assets enumerated in it: <em>Re Kerzner Estate</em>, 2008 CanLII 42020 (ON&nbsp;S.C.).&quot;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt">I hope this helps.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt">Chris&nbsp;Graham</span></p>]]></description>
<link>http://estatelaw.hullandhull.com/2008/11/articles/topics/estate-trust/multiple-wills-can-mean-multiple-certificates-of-appointment/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estatelaw.hullandhull.com/2008/11/articles/topics/estate-trust/multiple-wills-can-mean-multiple-certificates-of-appointment/</guid>
<category>
probate</category><category>&quot;Chris Graham 
dual Wills 
multiple Wills 
multiple &quot;</category><category>Certificate</category><category>Estate &amp; Trust</category><category>Litigation</category><category>applications</category><category>appointment</category><category>estate</category><category>of</category><category>trustee&quot;</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 04:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Hull and Hull LLP</dc:creator>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>
