<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>in terrorem - Toronto Estate Law Blog</title>
<link>http://estatelaw.hullandhull.com/articles/topics/estate-trust/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:28:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:34:46 -0500</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>In Terrorem Clauses in Wills</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>While some may find the contents of certain Wills frightening, there is one type of clause that has the name to go with the concept: the <em>in terrorem </em>clause.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/I/InTerrorem.aspx">In terrorem&nbsp;</a></em>is Latin for in terror, fright, threat or warning.&nbsp; An <em>in terrorem </em>clause is drafted to discourage frivolous Will challenge litigation by beneficiaries. The clause provides that if the validity of the Will is challenged by a beneficiary who receives gifts, that beneficiary&rsquo;s entitlement to the gift is forfeited.</p>
<p>A condition of this nature imposed on a gift can be effective in avoiding litigation in situations where the testator wishes to leave unequal gifts among beneficiaries (his or her children, for example), which&nbsp;is&nbsp;likely to be perceived as unfair.</p>
<p>If a gift to a disappointed beneficiary is substantial, that beneficiary should be seriously dissuaded from a frivolous or spiteful challenge to the validity of a Will containing an <em>in terrorem </em>clause.</p>
<p>Such a clause should be limited to challenges to the validity of the Will and not to proceedings relating to interpretation or related matters over which the court has exclusive jurisdiction, otherwise the clause may be ineffective.</p>
<p>For some helpful discussion of the <em>in terrorem </em>doctrine see <a href="http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2003/2003bcsc563/2003bcsc563.html"><em>Bellinger v. Fayers </em>2003 BCSC 563 (CanLII).&nbsp;</a><br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p>Sharon Davis - <a href="http://www.hullandhull.com/Lawyers/Sharon-Davis.shtml"><em>Click here for more information on Sharon Davis</em></a>. </p>]]></description>
<link>http://estatelaw.hullandhull.com/2010/07/articles/topics/estate-trust/in-terrorem-clauses-in-wills/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estatelaw.hullandhull.com/2010/07/articles/topics/estate-trust/in-terrorem-clauses-in-wills/</guid>
<category>Estate &amp; Trust</category><category>Estate Planning</category><category>Litigation</category><category>forfeiture clause</category><category>in terrorem</category><category>no contest</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:28:48 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Hull and Hull LLP</dc:creator>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>
