Estates & Trusts Spring Events

Spring is a time for conferences and events.  Here are a few upcoming Estates and Trusts programs you might be interested in.

The Ontario Bar Association is having its annual Dinner with the Honourable Estates List Judges on Tuesday, April 27th at 6:00 p.m. at the OBA Conference Centre in Toronto. It is a great opportunity for estates practitioners to mingle with their own as well as with the Honourable Justices Brown, Conway and Strathy. It has been over a year since the Toronto Estates List Practice Direction so come on out and give some feedback! Last year's dinner was fun and informative so I expect more of the same this year.

Click here for details and registration.   
 
The OBA is also holding an event on Thursday, May 20th from 1:00 to 4:30 p.m. entitled "Solicitors as Attorneys, Trustees and Estate Trustees - What You Need to Know". If you are a lawyer who has taken on any of these roles, or intend to, this program is for you. "Learn how to get paid, how to avoid being sued, and how to manage disputes with family members or co-trustee". That pretty much says it all.

Click here for details and registration.

Osgoode's 7th Annual Intensive Wills & Estates Workshop, with Hull & Hull LLP's own Jordan Atin as Workshop Leader, takes place over three Thursday evenings, June 10, 17 & 24, and runs from 6:00 - 9:00 p.m. at the Osgoode Professional Development Centre, Toronto. Jordan has certainly enlightened me on many occasions so I'm sure he can do the same for you.  For a preview, check out this link to see Jordan on Canada AM.

Click here for details and registration.

That should be enough ongoing learning to keep you busy until summer vacation…enjoy!
 

Sharon Davis - Click here for more information on Sharon Davis.
 

The Drafting of Wills -Part 2 - The Specifics of Charitable Giving - Hull on Estate and Succession Planning #156

 

 Listen to The Drafting of Wills -Part 2 - The Specifics of Charitable Giving

This week on Hull on Estates and Succession Planning, Ian Hull and Jordan Atin continue their discussion on the drafting of wills and take a closer look at the specifics of charitable giving.

If you have any comments, send us an email at hullandhull@gmail.com or leave a comment on our blog.

The Drafting of Wills - Part 2 - The Specifics of Charitable Giving - Hull on Estate and Succession Planning #156

Posted on March 18th, 2009 by Hull & Hull LLP

Welcome to Hull on Estates and Succession Planning, a series of podcasts hosted by Ian Hull and Suzana Popovic-Montag. The podcast you’re listening to will provide information and insights into estate planning in Canada. From the offices of Hull & Hull in Toronto, here are Ian and Suzana.

Ian Hull:   Hi and welcome to Hull on Estate and Succession Planning. We’re on our mini-series, Part 2, with Jordan Atin, and I’m Ian Hull.

Well Jordan, last week the podcast that we delved into was sort of talking about gifting and then specifically about charitable gifting.

Jordan Atin:  Right.

Ian Hull:  So today, let’s spend some time talking about some of the specifics of charitable giving.

Jordan Atin:  Sure.

Ian Hull:   And both Jordan and I, with great pride, can say that we are not tax lawyers and we don’t pretend to give any tax advice ever in our day and certainly not today. But the tax element of charitable giving, I think, is worth talking about and some of the concepts. It seems to me its such a personal decision. It’s also very personal that people, we tell our clients to go see your advisor and see your own tax advisor,

Jordan Atin:  Right.

Ian Hull:   Because you’re personal circumstances will drive what charitable style or effect of the charitable giving you can use. So if we step back and we talk about charitable giving generally, what are the two sort of approaches to charitable giving in a Will and typically set out?

Jordan Atin:  Well one classic way is to leave an amount, for example, a specific amount. I leave $100,000 to X charity for the general purposes of the charity. For example, maybe I just like this charity and I want to leave a specific amount, I trust them to do what they wish with it. So that’s one way of doing it. And there’s all kinds of variations on that. You can leave a percentage of your estate to a charity as well rather than a fixed amount. Maybe you want to leave a quarter or some percentage. So that’s two ways of at least giving some amount to charity. The other way, and like you say there are a myriad of different ways, but another way is to sort of control what those funds are used for. And so you can direct, and they’re called donor-advised funds. So you as the donor are advising the charity as far as what purposes you are to use that for. I only want it for research; I only want it if it’s going to a hospital for benefit of care; those sorts of things.

Ian Hull:   Now let’s step back then. And if we’re looking at the charitable giving, the process, one of the things that I struggle with when we’re on the contentious side is that battles over a charitable gift can be sort of subsumed by the fact that when someone was alive, they over-fixated on the tax benefit and they planned for the tax as opposed to planning for the gift.

Jordan Atin:  Right.

Ian Hull:   Do you see that sort of thing, and do you talk to your clients about that?

Jordan Atin:  Yeah, for sure. I mean people are, to some degree, obsessed with taxation and minimizing it. That’s fine. That is, in my view as a lawyer, sort of the least important. If you can do everything that you want to do and then save tax, that’s great. If the tax is driving where your estate is going, I think you’re probably having the tail wag the dog.

Ian Hull:   And speaking of that, what’s a good classic example of the tail wagging the dog is, of course, probate tax.

Jordan Atin:  Right. So what people will do is put things in joint ownership, for example, when really with one kid. And really the intention is that they’re to share that asset among all the kids but just for tax planning, they’re going to put everything joint with one kid. And sure enough when the parent dies and the one kid says well Mom really meant it all to go to me, there’s a dispute now. And so that really didn’t accomplish what the intention was.

Ian Hull:   Alright. So let’s take a moment and talk a little bit about the specifics of the tax concepts. And the tax concepts are, of course, that when you give gifts of property, either on your death or if you give it during your lifetime, depending on the circumstances, there’s this whole…I mean the one tax in Canada that we’re cursed with, so to speak, is the deemed disposition tax. When something is disposed of, there’s a tax on the capital gain, the growth in whatever that is. An easy example would be shares. The classic example, the demutualized shares that came out of the insurance industry a few years ago. They were all issues to people who owned the policies but they’re issued at zero cost base.

Jordan Atin:  Right.

Ian Hull:   So eventually when people sell those shares, there’s going to be a big tax hit in there because they all came out and popped up in the $20 range and so forth and went up and down from there.

Jordan Atin:  And basically if you’re just trying to estimate that, you’d basically say if I bought it for zero and its X dollars now, the tax that you’re actually going to pay on that is a quarter of X, that’s the basic way of thinking of it.

Ian Hull:   So one of the tricks, if our goal is to give to our family or at a minimum give to charity, one of the great tools that the government of Canada has allowed us to do is to donate shares.

Jordan Atin:  Right.

Ian Hull:   And to specifically donate shares to a charity, whether you do it during your lifetime or at death. But if we’re going to, for today’s podcast, focus on death, when that deemed disposition occurs and that donation of shares goes specifically and expressly to a charity, there can be a tremendous tax advantage to your tax burden on your death.

Jordan Atin:  Right, exactly. 

Ian Hull:   And you can help either way at that 25% hit that is lurking.

Jordan Atin:  Right.

Ian Hull:   On the shares.

Jordan Atin:  And obviously we’re talking about sort of death planning. I mean that’s the one day when you know you’re going to sell those shares because that’s what our tax code says is that on the day of death, you’re deemed to have sold everything. So you know there’s going to be a hit there. And that’s why sometimes people make the charitable donation then because that’s when they’re going to trigger the tax.

Ian Hull:   Right. And we have the other options, of course, if we’re going to want to give to charity. And it’s a nice thing because you want to enhance your estate as best you can, so the more money that you can spread around and the less tax you pay, actually if you talk to good financial advisors, you can net yourself out and do very well to save tax and enhance your family and enhance the charity.

Jordan Atin:  You basically are creating more money by giving to charity and therefore reducing the amount you’re going…the only people who lose is the government and the charities take that extra money. So yeah, if structured properly, there’s a great savings there.

Ian Hull:   So another idea is that you could also consider if you wanted to lock down a specific amount, for example, is to designate a charity on your RRSP as the recipient on your death, or on your RIF. So you know the fixed amount or thereabouts that you’re going to be giving and you end up creating another tremendous tax savings on the date of death when the capital gains is triggered because as we know, on RIFs and RRSPS, there’s a very big inherent tax payable on that amount.

Jordan Atin:  Yeah, we were talking about the 25% rule on capital property. I mean it’s even worse; it’s double that on a RIF or an RRSP because you basically, 100% of the value of that RRSP or RIF goes into income and you’re going to be paying 50% tax likely if it’s a sizable RIF. So tax is 50% of the RIF. So that’s how important charities, you know, that’s the benefit of appointing charities as beneficiaries of that because the tax is so low.

Ian Hull:   So significant. 

Jordan Atin:  Yeah.

Ian Hull:   So that’s another tool. I mean, really what we wanted to do today was just take some of these tools and illustrate the need to consider these options if you want to balance the gifting to the family and gifting to family and friends or whoever and to charities. Another idea is of course if you have share options and so forth because if you cash in a share option during your lifetime, it’s thrown into your income as income for that year.

Jordan Atin:  Right.

Ian Hull:   And another option is allow for that possibly to be dealt with on death to a charity.

Jordan Atin:  Right, for sure.

Ian Hull:   So those are the three just simple ideas that come about.

Jordan Atin:  Can I mention one more?

Ian Hull:   Oh I encourage it.

Jordan Atin:  I mean, people use life insurance as well and designating charities of life insurance policies which is another…you know when that monies coming in and there’s some complicated tax benefits to it but, yeah, that’s another one.

Ian Hull: That’s great. So we’ve got four good illustrations. 

So we’ve now enhanced the size of our estate, we’ve told our family about the charitable gifting that we’re going to do.

Jordan Atin: Right.

Ian Hull: So there’s not going to be a fight. And we’ve left a great legacy because we feel we owe that to our next generations and so forth. So again, thank you very much for joining me today.

Jordan Atin: It’s been my great pleasure, thanks.

Ian Hull: Well, thank you. I remind everyone please to go to familywar.com to get Jordan’s book. He explains these concepts in much more detail. And I appreciate you taking your time today. Thanks a lot.

Jordan Atin: Thanks Ian.

You have been listening to Hull on Estates and Succession Planning by Ian Hull and Suzana Popovic-Montag.  The podcast that you have been listening to has been provided as an information service. It is a summary of current issues in estates and estate planning. It is not legal advice and you are reminded to always speak with a legal professional regarding your specific circumstance.

 

To listen to other Hull & Hull podcasts, or leave any questions or comments, please visit our website at hullestatemediation.com

Estate Planning for the Newly Separated Spouse - Hull on Estates Podcast #125

Listen to Estate Planning for the Newly Separated Spouse

This week on Hull on Estates, Ian and Suzana bring us up to date on what has been happening at Hull and Hull over the summer. Jordan Atin appeared on Canada AM to talk about how to avoid The Family War. They have also added two books to their recommended reading list:

Duct Tape Marketing by John Jantsch

Endless Referrals by Bob Burg

Ian and Suzana then discuss issues to consider in estate planning for the newly separated spouse. They talk about the two different types of claims that can be made: Equalization and Claim for support.

A new Hull and Hull breakfast series will take place on Wednesday, October 8, 2008 and participants are encouraged to attend either via webcast or in person. You can also contact Hull and Hull by leaving a message or question with any of the following:

Send us an email at hull.lawyers@gmail.com, call us on the comment line at 206-350-6636, or leave us a comment on the Hull on Estates blog.

 

Estate Planning for the Newly Separated Spouse - Hull on Estates Podcast #125

Posted on August 26th, 2008 by Hull & Hull LLP

Suzana Popovic-Montag:  Hi and welcome to Hull on Estates. You’re listening to Episode #125 of our podcast on Tuesday, August 26th, 2008.

Welcome to Hull on Estates, a series of podcasts for the Canadian legal community dealing with issues and insights surrounding estate planning in Canada.  Hosted by the lawyers of Hull & Hull, the podcast will touch on some key considerations when planning estates and wills. Now, here are today’s hosts.

 

Suzana Popovic-Montag: Hi and welcome to another episode of Hull on Estates. I’m Suzana Popovic-Montag.

Ian Hull: And I’m Ian Hull. And I want to welcome everyone and remind you to please give us your feedback. Call-in number is 206-350-6636, that’s 206-350-6636.

Suzana Popovic-Montag: Or you can feel free to give us an e-mail at hull.lawyers@gmail.com and of course you can visit our blog, our daily blog, at estatelaw.hullandhull.com.

Ian Hull: Well Suzana, we are going to cover a few topics today on Hull on Estates. One of them is our post-Olympic wrap-up, more or less, our summer wrap-up. We’ve had a busy summer here at Hull & Hull. Been working through some new technology on Hull on Estates and Succession Planning. For those of you who are interested, we’re trying to launch and certainly will have up shortly if its not up by the time this podcast is launched, is our other podcast is going to be on YouTube and we’re trying to do it in the format of video and audio. So we’re having some fun with that and trying that out this summer.

We’ve also had a busy summer, our associate counsel Jordan Atin spent the week on Canada AM in early August, having some interviews and dealing with the age-old question of how to avoid the family war. We had a great summer dealing with some of the media. Actually generally at Hull & Hull, one of the things that we were able to do was have an interesting interview with the magazine called CARP. And that’s the Canadian Association of Retired Persons. We were good enough to be quoted in the August, 2008 edition and it was all about the family feud. We talked a lot about some of the different problems that arise in the context of the family feud and the author really dove into, Jennifer Walker was the author of the article. And she talked about the fact that boomers are set to inherit a trillion dollars over the next years, in the next decade from their parents, and dealt with how to plan your estate the right way to avoid the battle royale. So we’ve been spending a lot of time this summer trying to get out our message of equal isn’t always fair and ways to somehow make your intentions clear.

Suzana Popovic-Montag: We’ve also done a lot of reading as well, Ian, as you know. And we’ve added to our recommended reading heading under our web page some of the great books that we’ve come across over the course of the summer, including Duct Tape Marketing, which talks about the world’s most practical small business marketing guide, by John Jantsch as well as Endless Referrals: Network your everyday contacts into sales, a great book by Bob Burg.

Ian Hull: So you can hit our web page under the links and we continue to update our recommended reading list. We’ve got quite a few books on there now. I know I also finished up Blink this summer, The Power of Thinking Without Thinking, by Malcolm Gladwell. And that was one of those books that I read in the spring and then had to re-read parts of it in the summer when I had some more time because it was a terrific book.

So for today’s podcast, we’re going to talk about sort of in brief, some issues to consider in the context of estate planning for the newly separated spouse. We know that historically here in Ontario, we work with a community of property regime. And that regime is consistent throughout many, many, well all provinces and many, many states in the United States. And it is coming into vogue in many other European countries such as in the UK for sure. So this community of property, basically the concept is that a newly separated spouse is entitled to sit down and do the math and the spouses are supposed to equalize their net worth at the end of the day, based on the increasing value during their relationship. Now that’s the historic sort of framework that here in Ontario we are always working from. But we wanted to talk a little bit today about the nature of the claim, who can make that claim and maybe some protective steps that can come about that.

So Suzana, when we’re dealing with the nature of the claim, there are sort of two types of claims that a newly separated spouse may want to consider. The first is what I’ve talked about, and that is the idea of an equalization.

Suzana Popovic-Montag: And the second, of course, is a claim for support under, here in Ontario, the Succession Law Reform Act. And that claim arises in situations where someone, namely a dependant, someone who fits within the definition of that term dependant, can demonstrate that they have not been adequately provided for by the deceased, either in his or her Will, or by virtue of an intestacy.

Ian Hull: And so if we’ve got these two core claims, the equalization claim itself, of course, is made through what is a relatively cumbersome process of sitting down and creating sort of a list of all of your assets and liabilities, looking at the value of those assets and liabilities as at the date of marriage, and then looking at them as at the date of separation. And when we talk about the newly separated spouse, of course we don’t want to forget that a separated spouse could be permanently separated by death, of course. So that calculation comes into our world fairly regularly. And it’s interesting when you do that calculation, how much of a difference the detail makes. And one of the things that we like to tell our clients is that if you are in a situation, whether you are happily married or you about to be newly separated, there is a lot of good reason to keep careful records of your own personal records, because then you can really sit down if you’re forced to this because of an untimely death on a more positive note, sit down and calculate this, you will have your record. So it’s worth holding on to some bank records and holding on to your personal affairs records as best you can.

Suzana Popovic-Montag: And when you talk about records, Ian, I think you’re referring to lists of, for instance, assets and liabilities, as of the date of marriage, so that when it comes to doing this cumbersome calculation at the end of the day, you’ve got a listing of everything that you own, both personal and real property wise, together with mortgages or a listing of all other liabilities that you’ve incurred prior to marriage.

Ian Hull: So that’s the way you make a claim, and you do it, in our jurisdiction, under the Family Law Act. And making a claim as a dependant is done almost similarly. You bring an application into the Court and you put to the Court your circumstances, your financial circumstances. And you apply to the Court for support.

Suzana Popovic-Montag: And one of the things that we try to keep in mind when we’re dealing with newly separated spouses is that whether or not someone has actually been married does matter for the purposes of an FLA or Family Law Act election, whereas a spouse is defined differently under the Succession Law Reform Act.

Ian Hull: And its defined more broadly, which of course is sensible and picks up on things like same-sex relationships, things like common-law relationships. If it’s a relationship of three years of some permanence, the right to pursue a claim is eliminated if you’re in a common-law situation under the Family Law Act but you’re saved, so to speak, or preserved, under the Succession Law Reform Act. So that’s an important, sort of, stepping stone into the process. 

Now one of the things that people often ask us is how important is a domestic contract in both these claims, in the family law context and in the dependant’s relief context? And we want to sort of carefully look at the contract in each situation. In the family law context, obviously if the claim is, if the contract is created in the right environment, I mean by a properly, independently advised situation with lots of disclosure, these contracts when you go to elect, can be very cumbersome and can be very strong and enforceable.

Suzana Popovic-Montag: And you can sort of contrast that to a dependant’s relief situation when you’re making an application for support where, at least here in Ontario, the existence of a domestic contract is one of the factors that a Court will take into consideration when determining whether or not support ought to be awarded. And so we’ve come to sort of view domestic contracts and support situations as not quite as iron-clad as they are in a Family Law Act situation but certainly of persuasive effect for a judge.

Ian Hull: And the culture really is that the domestic contracts, done properly, are seen by the Courts as sensible contractual relationships within a marriage situation or, of course, in situations when you pass away. Most family law contracts will also include a clause to say that you can’t make a claim against the estate. But the culture in a dependant’s relief case, whether you’re married or not married, is very different because the Act simply says you can apply, you can enforce the contracts or you can ignore the contracts. And its funny, I mean the Act expressly says, Section 62 says the Court should take into account the contracts and Section 63 says you can ignore the contracts, or vice versa, I haven’t got them right in front of me, that’s the theme. So the whole concept is that your entitlement can be limited and the last point is that we want to watch very carefully on any of these types of claims, is that we want to press on with some vim and vigour because you have very strict limitation periods. Under the Family Law Act the claim to make an election under the Family Law Act is 6 months from death.

Suzana Popovic-Montag: And under the Succession Law Reform Act its 6 months from the date that probate has been granted.

Ian Hull: So that’s just a summary review of some of the family law considerations in a newly separated spouse. We want to remind everyone that our next Breakfast presentation will be on Wednesday, October 8th, 2008, that’s the Hull & Hull Breakfast, which we hold 3 times a year. We do it by way of web cast and we do it by way of personal attendance or phone-in. So please feel free to join us in any one of those forums. And if you have any questions about that, you can hit our web page or, of course, call or send us an e-mail at hull.lawyers@gmail.com.

Suzana Popovic-Montag: Or just pick up the phone or leave us a message on our comment line at 206-350-6636. Thanks very much, Ian.

Ian Hull: Thanks Suzana.

This has been Hull on Estates with the lawyers of Hull & Hull. The podcast you have been listening to has been provided as an information service. It is a summary of current legal issues in estates and estate planning. It is not legal advice and you are reminded to always talk with a legal professional regarding your specific circumstances.

 

To listen to other podcasts, or to leave a question or comment, please visit our website at www.hullandhull.com.

 

Our theme music is Upper Structure by DJ AKid  and is courtesy of the Podsafe Music Network.

 

/mem