<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>spousal - Toronto Estate Law Blog</title>
<link>http://estatelaw.hullandhull.com/articles/blog-posts-hull-on-estates/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 01:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:59:46 -0500</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Hold the bun - The Trust of Dr.Robert Atkins</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>You know a&nbsp;trust has the potential to&nbsp;run off the rails when&nbsp;the beneficiary refers&nbsp;to the trustees&nbsp;as &quot;The Three Musketeers&quot;.</p><p>After his untimely death in 2003, Dr. Robert&nbsp;Atkins'&nbsp;widow&nbsp;sold his business netting proceeds of some $420 million. In his will, the famous diet guru set up two trusts: (i) a&nbsp;spousal trust that would benefit his wife, holding 90% of his assets, and (ii)&nbsp;a research foundation which would get the remaining&nbsp;10%.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p>Cue the sword clanging of the three musketeers:&nbsp;&nbsp;a self-described entrepreneur,&nbsp;an accountant,&nbsp;and a lawyer, who befriended Ms. Atkins and&nbsp;became the widow's closest advisors as well as trustees for the&nbsp;spousal trust (replacing the two trustees who had been appointed by Dr. Atkins).&nbsp;It is reported that Ms. Atkins subsequently agreed to pay each of them $1.2 million per year (excluding bonuses), signed them to 10-yr contracts, and allowed each of them to take out a $5 million life insurance policy on her life, naming themselves as beneficiaries.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>Fast forward to&nbsp;a <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB117763468467184266-zdkcNKbU_5ty1GgVxu_KLmxb68E_20070527.html?mod=fpa_editors_picks">Wall Street Journal online report&nbsp;</a> that a lawsuit had been filed by the Musketeers accusing&nbsp;Ms. Atkins of improperly firing them.&nbsp; Ms. Atkins and her new spouse asked for the trio to be removed as her trustees and further sought reimbursement of some of their fees.&nbsp;&nbsp;The relationship&nbsp;between the Musketeers and Ms. Atkins began to disintegrate in 2006 when Ms. Atkins met her new spouse to be, who himself then became increasingly involved in&nbsp;her&nbsp;finances. When the Musketeers&nbsp;balked at her new spouse's demands to encroach for an additional $100 million for Ms. Atkins (above and beyond her $15 million annual income), he started making noise about having them removed as trustees.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>$420 million.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p>That's a lot of bread.</p><p>Have a great weekend,</p><p>David</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://estatelaw.hullandhull.com/2007/11/articles/blog-posts-hull-on-estates/hold-the-bun-the-trust-of-drrobert-atkins/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estatelaw.hullandhull.com/2007/11/articles/blog-posts-hull-on-estates/hold-the-bun-the-trust-of-drrobert-atkins/</guid>
<category>Archived BLOG POSTS - Hull on Estates</category><category>Trusts</category><category>of</category><category>removal</category><category>spousal</category><category>trustees</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 01:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>nonley@hullandhull.com (Hull &amp; Hull LLP)</author>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>